Which is why going from system admin into network engineering is the way to
go, stop them in their tracks! lol.
Thanks,
Morgan
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Scott Granados
wrote:
> I thought that was standard operating procedure for the systems guys to
> blame the network?
>
> :)
>
> On Ju
I thought that was standard operating procedure for the systems guys to blame
the network?
:)
On Jun 17, 2014, at 1:59 PM, Morgan McLean wrote:
> If I had a dollar for every time the systems guys changed something and
> then cried to neteng... :)
>
> Thanks,
> Morgan
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2
If I had a dollar for every time the systems guys changed something and
then cried to neteng... :)
Thanks,
Morgan
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 7:11 AM, John Neiberger
wrote:
> This all turned out to be a false alarm. Someone on the server team had
> changed the configuration on all the servers such
This all turned out to be a false alarm. Someone on the server team had
changed the configuration on all the servers such that they were ignoring
RAs from the MX960. Everyone thought the EX4550 wasn't passing the RAs
because the filter they used to catch them wasn't apparently catching them.
The co
Hi,
It won't help you i fear but i did see exactly the same defect on some
other concurrent platform (cisco 3560G).
With the latest IOS software (15.x) a 3560G unit in L3 mode does
correctly send RA and reply to RS, but the same
unit in L2 mode between a router and a server fail to deliver RA/RS
This does seem to be specific to RA/RS. I haven't been involved in
troubleshooting over the weekend but the updates I read said that they took
some packet captures of RA messages from the Cisco 7600 that the switch
used to be connected to and compared them with captures taken from the
MX960. They f
On 14/06/14 22:24, John Neiberger wrote:
The EX4550 is just layer two. There is no routing configured on it, so it
should just be passing the RAs from the router to the hosts on the second
switch, but that doesn't seem to be happening.
Is it RA/RS specific, or is forwarding to fe80::1 and rela
I was paged to take a look at an interesting problem this morning. We have
an MX960 connected to an EX4550 via a trunk carrying multiple VLANs. The
EX4550 is, in turn, connected to a second switch. I don't recall what model.
The second switch used to be connected to something else and was moved ov
8 matches
Mail list logo
