Yes you need at least one xre. I suggest you read juniper documentation on
the 8200 VC.
Morgan
On Thursday, August 15, 2013, Robert Hass wrote:
> Do I need 2x XRE to have Virtual-Chassis of EX8200 or I can do this without
> XRE ?
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Morgan McLean
>
Do I need 2x XRE to have Virtual-Chassis of EX8200 or I can do this without
XRE ?
Rob
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Morgan McLean wrote:
> The 8200 vc stability is the best out of the EX lineup in my testing. I
> can't make it fall over, where as I can find corner cases that will crash
> 3
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Robert Hass wrote:
How Virtual-Chassis on Juniper EX8200 is different than Catalyst 6500
(Sup2T) VSS ?
If you haven't already purchased ex8200s, talk to your juniper rep
regarding the lifespan of the box and the linecard roadmap.
The ex9200 appears to be the future in
The 8200 vc stability is the best out of the EX lineup in my testing. I
can't make it fall over, where as I can find corner cases that will crash
3300s etc.
Just keep in mind the VC connections will only work with certain line cards
afaik. And I thought two RE's were required for dual xre use but
The EX8200 Virtual-Chassis w/ a couple of the XRE200's does well. The
XRE's act as the control plane and the 8200's end up just being
linecards. It's a bit hack-ish IMHO w/ a EX2200 switch acting as the
glue between each XRE and the 8200.
We've run 11.2 - 11.4 and pleased w/ the stability. Our
How Virtual-Chassis on Juniper EX8200 is different than Catalyst 6500
(Sup2T) VSS ?
Are both have shared control-plane ?
How about stability of Virtual-Chassis and VSS on latest software releases ?
I would like to implement core layer using EX8200 or Cat6500 (two core
switches).
Each core dev
6 matches
Mail list logo
