Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-26 Thread Keegan Holley
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:22:26AM +0300, Miroslav Georgiev wrote: > > Look at this: > > J-4350 > > Firewall Performance (Large Packets): 1.6 Gbps > > Firewall Performance (IMIX): 600 Mbps > > > > With some voice this router can't h

Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-26 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:22:26AM +0300, Miroslav Georgiev wrote: > Look at this: > J-4350 > Firewall Performance (Large Packets): 1.6 Gbps > Firewall Performance (IMIX): 600 Mbps > > With some voice this router can't handle more than 350Mbps in packet-mode. 225kpps * 1500 bytes = 2.7Gbps. 225kp

Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-26 Thread Miroslav Georgiev
Look at this: J-4350 Firewall Performance (Large Packets): 1.6 Gbps Firewall Performance (IMIX): 600 Mbps With some voice this router can't handle more than 350Mbps in packet-mode. On 10/26/2010 04:26 AM, Julien Goodwin wrote: On 26/10/10 08:54, Gabriel Blanchard wrote: We in fact use a J-

Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-25 Thread Julien Goodwin
On 26/10/10 08:54, Gabriel Blanchard wrote: > We in fact use a J-6350 at our office and we couldn't even get it to handle a > full routing table. (at least not very well). They handle a full routing table just fine. With the old packet-mode software they could do a full table (as of January) in 1

Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-25 Thread Gabriel Blanchard
On 2010-10-25, at 5:05 PM, Richard Zheng wrote: > Hi, > > A juniper reseller came back with a suggestion of J-4350. The price is > similar to a used M7i. I was surprised by this option first. Then > considering that the application is for a small ISP, it might not be bad. > The DRAM may be upgra

Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-25 Thread Joe Hamelin
The big difference is that the J series routes everything through the Intel CPU. They do some trick daemon scheduling to get the best packet rate out of them but it's still a software router. -- Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474 On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:

Re: [j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-25 Thread Keegan Holley
I've always thought of the J-Series as an enterprise/remote site router and not a service provider device. Strangely enough I can't find the throughput ratings on the data sheet, but I'm sure it's lower than the M/MX and the like. I'm not sure if it can handle 2-3G of traffic, you should ask the

[j-nsp] Fwd: router recommendation

2010-10-25 Thread Richard Zheng
Hi, A juniper reseller came back with a suggestion of J-4350. The price is similar to a used M7i. I was surprised by this option first. Then considering that the application is for a small ISP, it might not be bad. The DRAM may be upgraded to 2G which should hold several whole Internet tables for