On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:22:26AM +0300, Miroslav Georgiev wrote:
> > Look at this:
> > J-4350
> > Firewall Performance (Large Packets): 1.6 Gbps
> > Firewall Performance (IMIX): 600 Mbps
> >
> > With some voice this router can't h
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:22:26AM +0300, Miroslav Georgiev wrote:
> Look at this:
> J-4350
> Firewall Performance (Large Packets): 1.6 Gbps
> Firewall Performance (IMIX): 600 Mbps
>
> With some voice this router can't handle more than 350Mbps in packet-mode.
225kpps * 1500 bytes = 2.7Gbps.
225kp
Look at this:
J-4350
Firewall Performance (Large Packets): 1.6 Gbps
Firewall Performance (IMIX): 600 Mbps
With some voice this router can't handle more than 350Mbps in packet-mode.
On 10/26/2010 04:26 AM, Julien Goodwin wrote:
On 26/10/10 08:54, Gabriel Blanchard wrote:
We in fact use a J-
On 26/10/10 08:54, Gabriel Blanchard wrote:
> We in fact use a J-6350 at our office and we couldn't even get it to handle a
> full routing table. (at least not very well).
They handle a full routing table just fine. With the old packet-mode
software they could do a full table (as of January) in 1
On 2010-10-25, at 5:05 PM, Richard Zheng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A juniper reseller came back with a suggestion of J-4350. The price is
> similar to a used M7i. I was surprised by this option first. Then
> considering that the application is for a small ISP, it might not be bad.
> The DRAM may be upgra
The big difference is that the J series routes everything through the
Intel CPU. They do some trick daemon scheduling to get the best
packet rate out of them but it's still a software router.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Keegan Holley
wrote:
I've always thought of the J-Series as an enterprise/remote site router and
not a service provider device. Strangely enough I can't find the throughput
ratings on the data sheet, but I'm sure it's lower than the M/MX and the
like. I'm not sure if it can handle 2-3G of traffic, you should ask the
Hi,
A juniper reseller came back with a suggestion of J-4350. The price is
similar to a used M7i. I was surprised by this option first. Then
considering that the application is for a small ISP, it might not be bad.
The DRAM may be upgraded to 2G which should hold several whole Internet
tables for
8 matches
Mail list logo