Re: [j-nsp] Help: Learning routes from same ASN, cisco vs juniper

2013-09-11 Thread Payam Chychi
Unless im mistaken... Thats a safety which detects a loop and rejects the prefix Allowas-in as well as as-override will get you around it but dont mod unless you know how its going to affect ur network -- Payam Chychi Network Engineer / Security Specialist On Tuesday, 10 September, 2013 at

Re: [j-nsp] Help: Learning routes from same ASN, cisco vs juniper

2013-09-11 Thread OBrien, Will
I was too busy yesterday working on this to say thanks. The loops threshold was exactly what I needed although my upstream was ALSO filtering. I have to admit that it did take me a few minutes to realize that the loops limit also applies to external routes learned by an ibgp neighbor! the inter

Re: [j-nsp] Help: Learning routes from same ASN, cisco vs juniper

2013-09-10 Thread David Miller
On 9/10/2013 1:28 PM, OBrien, Will wrote: > I've found an interesting issue and I wanted to get some thoughts before > talking to JTAC about it. > > > I have a few of MX480s. In the past, I've advertised a dedicated /24 from my > lab to my providers upstream. > That /24 was never learned by

[j-nsp] Help: Learning routes from same ASN, cisco vs juniper

2013-09-10 Thread OBrien, Will
I've found an interesting issue and I wanted to get some thoughts before talking to JTAC about it. I have a few of MX480s. In the past, I've advertised a dedicated /24 from my lab to my providers upstream. That /24 was never learned by my primary MX. The issue comes down to either the MX or t