Hi,
It does. Please refer to the standard or, for your convenience, IEEE
802.3 interpretation 2-07/05 [1] (link from 802.3 Interpretations page
[2]).
[1] http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/interp/interp-2-0705.pdf
[2] http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/interp/index.html
Kaj
On Mar
I don't think the spec for gig includes auto-neg
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 23, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Niels Bakker wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Adams) [Fri 21 Mar 2008, 19:15 CET]:
> [..]
>> These are 10 and 100 meg metroE connections; I don't know what these
>> companies do for gigE.
>
> I
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Adams) [Fri 21 Mar 2008, 19:15 CET]:
[..]
>These are 10 and 100 meg metroE connections; I don't know what these
>companies do for gigE.
I would hope they follow the IEEE standard and implement all mandatory
parts of it - which includes autonegotiation.
-- Nie
Once upon a time, Peter E. Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Which telco? If you're really connecting to a 6500, it
> doesn't sound like AT&T (or at least the former SBC -- I've
> no experience with AT&T proper or Bellsouth). Their
> standard is always to disable autoneg (note that I
> personally
That's sort of my issue as well. We have a couple of these cards being
used for telco connections in colos.
One seemed to work fine to a certain carrier, once we got them to enable
autonegotiation on their end.
Now we're trying to bring up another link, with a different carrier, and
running in
> In my case, autonegotiation is a problem because I have to
> connect to telco-supplied metro-Ethernet boxes that the
> telco forces to a particular speed/duplex (and then
> disables autonegotiation on their end). Yes, it sucks,
> but I can only connect to what they provide. --
Which telco?
Once upon a time, angel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> BTW - why you think it is an autonegotiation problem? What is the output
> of "show interfaces" command?
In my case, autonegotiation is a problem because I have to connect to
telco-supplied metro-Ethernet boxes that the telco forces to a
particu
Matt Stevens wrote:
> Is there anyone out there that can verify whether or not the 1-port SFP
> ePIM for the J-Series supports manually configuring the speed/duplex
> (disabling autonegotiation)?
>
> Apparently the 6-port uPIM does not support this, and we're running
> into issues getting an LX
Is there anyone out there that can verify whether or not the 1-port SFP
ePIM for the J-Series supports manually configuring the speed/duplex
(disabling autonegotiation)?
Apparently the 6-port uPIM does not support this, and we're running
into issues getting an LX link up with a Cisco 6500. Pos
9 matches
Mail list logo
