Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

2009-09-11 Thread Yue Min
Yes, that's true. Unnecessary policy is not a good thing. Power of junos makes me abuse policy sometimes. :) On 9/10/09, Stefan Fouant wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Yue Min wrote: > >> Actually I feel the way ( all community in all routers rather than >> specific community in speci

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

2009-09-10 Thread Stefan Fouant
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Yue Min wrote: > Actually I feel the way ( all community in all routers rather than > specific community in specific router ) would save your time not waste > your time. > I guess it depends on what you are doing. Doing a copy and paste of a bunch of community

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

2009-09-10 Thread Yue Min
Actually I feel the way ( all community in all routers rather than specific community in specific router ) would save your time not waste your time. On 9/10/09, Stefan Fouant wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Stevanus wrote: > >> Sorry for a little bit OOT. So suppose I configure bgp co

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

2009-09-10 Thread Stefan Fouant
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Stevanus wrote: > Sorry for a little bit OOT. So suppose I configure bgp community > attributes for all routers instead of all EBGP peering routers as required > in the exam, then I won't lose any points? > Thanks > > - Stevanus - > Again, you could do this, unl

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

2009-09-10 Thread Stevanus
Sorry for a little bit OOT. So suppose I configure bgp community attributes for all routers instead of all EBGP peering routers as required in the exam, then I won't lose any points? Thanks - Stevanus - Stefan Fouant wrote: On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Hoogen wrote: But since this wa

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

2009-09-08 Thread Stefan Fouant
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Hoogen wrote: > But since this was in the M-Series... and I would assume when they > mentioned > "permit four archived copies that will be no larger than 128K" > The solution should have been "archive size 128k files 4" and not just left > as default. Maybe there w

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

2009-09-07 Thread Hoogen
s & Regards, > Tarique A. Nalkhande > > > Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hoogen > Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 10:23 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] JN

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

2009-09-07 Thread Nalkhande Tarique Abbas
. Thanks & Regards, Tarique A. Nalkhande Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Hoogen Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 10:23 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 P

[j-nsp] JNCIP Case Study - 1 Pg 42 - archive size and files

2009-09-07 Thread Hoogen
Modify the syslog parameters to log all interactive CLI commands to a file called rn-cli, where n is equal to the router number. Configure the CLI log to permit four archived copies that will be no larger than 128K, and ensure that CLI-related logging is also sent to 10.0.200.2, which is providing