On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 10:25:48 PM Paul Stewart
wrote:
> - the BRAS function seems
> quite "cutting edge" for me at this point to be
> honest.
Our feelings are similar re: BRAS even for the chassis-based
MX-series routers (MX480 in our case).
We're having to run the very latest co
January 25, 2012 9:17:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX40 / MX80 as a edge aggregator
>
> You need to ask him to add the following licensed to the QUOTE:
>
> S-SA-8K
> S-MX80-SA-FP
> S-MX80-SSM-FP
>
>
> It works fine for me.
>
> Att,
>
> Giuliano
ssers
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 9:12 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper MX40 / MX80 as a edge aggregator
Hi list,
We are in the process of selecting an edge platform for the following
featureset :
- Routing BGP/OSPF with less than 10K routes
- PPPoE for >5000
You need to ask him to add the following licensed to the QUOTE:
S-SA-8K
S-MX80-SA-FP
S-MX80-SSM-FP
It works fine for me.
Att,
Giuliano
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:11, Remco Bressers wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> We are in the process of selecting an edge platform for the following
> featureset :
>
Hi list,
We are in the process of selecting an edge platform for the following
featureset :
- Routing BGP/OSPF with less than 10K routes
- PPPoE for >5000 ethernet customers
- >5000 traffic policies on these customers. We want to be able to
select a traffic profile (2Mbps to GigE) per PPPoE custo
5 matches
Mail list logo