Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX40 / MX80 as a edge aggregator

2012-01-26 Thread Mark Tinka
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012 10:25:48 PM Paul Stewart wrote: > - the BRAS function seems > quite "cutting edge" for me at this point to be > honest. Our feelings are similar re: BRAS even for the chassis-based MX-series routers (MX480 in our case). We're having to run the very latest co

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX40 / MX80 as a edge aggregator

2012-01-25 Thread Matthew S. Crocker
January 25, 2012 9:17:36 AM > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX40 / MX80 as a edge aggregator > > You need to ask him to add the following licensed to the QUOTE: > > S-SA-8K > S-MX80-SA-FP > S-MX80-SSM-FP > > > It works fine for me. > > Att, > > Giuliano

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX40 / MX80 as a edge aggregator

2012-01-25 Thread Paul Stewart
ssers Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 9:12 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper MX40 / MX80 as a edge aggregator Hi list, We are in the process of selecting an edge platform for the following featureset : - Routing BGP/OSPF with less than 10K routes - PPPoE for >5000

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper MX40 / MX80 as a edge aggregator

2012-01-25 Thread Giuliano Medalha
You need to ask him to add the following licensed to the QUOTE: S-SA-8K S-MX80-SA-FP S-MX80-SSM-FP It works fine for me. Att, Giuliano On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:11, Remco Bressers wrote: > Hi list, > > We are in the process of selecting an edge platform for the following > featureset : >

[j-nsp] Juniper MX40 / MX80 as a edge aggregator

2012-01-25 Thread Remco Bressers
Hi list, We are in the process of selecting an edge platform for the following featureset : - Routing BGP/OSPF with less than 10K routes - PPPoE for >5000 ethernet customers - >5000 traffic policies on these customers. We want to be able to select a traffic profile (2Mbps to GigE) per PPPoE custo