2011/8/25 Saku Ytti
> On (2011-08-25 10:36 +0100), Danny Vernals wrote:
>
> > Using it to monitor availability worked fine but if you're planning on
> > monitoring latency and jitter then my findings were to do this you'd
> > need an MS-DPC. With an MS-DPC the service can use two-way time
> > st
On (2011-08-25 10:36 +0100), Danny Vernals wrote:
> Using it to monitor availability worked fine but if you're planning on
> monitoring latency and jitter then my findings were to do this you'd
> need an MS-DPC. With an MS-DPC the service can use two-way time
> stamping, without one you can only
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Keegan Holley
wrote:
> Does anyone have any experiences with RPM on MX boxes? I'm a bit leary of
> monitoring daemons and probes running directly on routes. Then there's the
> recent bug circus with the 9 and 10 code trains. I also can't remember
> coming across
Does anyone have any experiences with RPM on MX boxes? I'm a bit leary of
monitoring daemons and probes running directly on routes. Then there's the
recent bug circus with the 9 and 10 code trains. I also can't remember
coming across it anywhere in the wild. Just wondering if anyone has had any
4 matches
Mail list logo