Re: [j-nsp] Juniper RPM Monitoring

2011-08-26 Thread Keegan Holley
2011/8/25 Saku Ytti > On (2011-08-25 10:36 +0100), Danny Vernals wrote: > > > Using it to monitor availability worked fine but if you're planning on > > monitoring latency and jitter then my findings were to do this you'd > > need an MS-DPC. With an MS-DPC the service can use two-way time > > st

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper RPM Monitoring

2011-08-25 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2011-08-25 10:36 +0100), Danny Vernals wrote: > Using it to monitor availability worked fine but if you're planning on > monitoring latency and jitter then my findings were to do this you'd > need an MS-DPC. With an MS-DPC the service can use two-way time > stamping, without one you can only

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper RPM Monitoring

2011-08-25 Thread Danny Vernals
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Keegan Holley wrote: > Does anyone have any experiences with RPM on MX boxes?  I'm a bit leary of > monitoring daemons and probes running directly on routes.  Then there's the > recent bug circus with the 9 and 10 code trains.  I also can't remember > coming across

[j-nsp] Juniper RPM Monitoring

2011-08-24 Thread Keegan Holley
Does anyone have any experiences with RPM on MX boxes? I'm a bit leary of monitoring daemons and probes running directly on routes. Then there's the recent bug circus with the 9 and 10 code trains. I also can't remember coming across it anywhere in the wild. Just wondering if anyone has had any