Re: [j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco NCS5/55 and ASR9001

I would be looking at the QFX10K or the QFX52xx series. Chat with your account team for the latest. Jared Mauch > On Nov 12, 2017, at 10:14 AM, Stephen Fulton wrote: > > Jason, > > For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80. I'd look at the MX204 > for a bit more future proofing -

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco NCS5/55 and ASR9001

Jason, For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80. I'd look at the MX204 for a bit more future proofing - 8x 10G ports and 4x 100G, looks like break out cables are an option for adding lower speed interfaces. -- Stephen On 2017-11-12 10:08 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: Hey there, I’m l

[j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco NCS5/55 and ASR9001

Hey there, I’m looking to get a basic handle on the Juniper equivalent to some Cisco kit that’s out there. For a NCS5001 comparison, the use case is a simple ISIS, LDP BGP-Free P Core LSR. QFX5110 seem to be closest. Fair? For a NCS5501-SE comparison, the use case would be for a peering rout