Re: [j-nsp] Junos 11.2R4.3 on MX

2011-12-25 Thread Joel jaeggli
On 12/21/11 12:20 , Brendan Mannella wrote: > Just wondering if anyone has been brave enough to run Junos 11.2R4.3 yet on > a MX960? We are currently on the latest 10.4, but would really like to > upgrade to get “trunk style” config on Trio line cards. I also noticed > during a previous ISSU that t

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 11.2R4.3 on MX

2011-12-24 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 09:27:55PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: > On Friday, December 23, 2011 07:51:45 PM Sebastian Wiesinger > wrote: > > > Oh and to fix it you have to reset the VPLS BGP sessions. > > Changing the config back does not help. > > That's a nasty bug. So, just another day using JUNO

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 11.2R4.3 on MX

2011-12-24 Thread Mark Tinka
On Friday, December 23, 2011 07:51:45 PM Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > Oh and to fix it you have to reset the VPLS BGP sessions. > Changing the config back does not help. That's a nasty bug. Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. _

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 11.2R4.3 on MX

2011-12-23 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
* Sebastian Wiesinger [2011-12-23 12:46]: > the PR is not public at the moment. We triggered it while changing > config in a VPLS instance (adding "vlan-id none" to it). After that > the VPLS broke (BGP Routes for the VPLS were withdrawn and not > readded). Oh and to fix it you have to reset the

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 11.2R4.3 on MX

2011-12-23 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
* Johannes Resch [2011-12-23 12:28]: > >* Jeff Richmond [2011-12-21 21:39]: > >>Yes, doing a lab eval on it and it has a nasty mibd leak bug. > >>Running a daily 11.2 build at the moment that fixes it (precursor to > >>R5 coming out in January). So, I would wait for R5 if you plan on > >>doing an

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 11.2R4.3 on MX

2011-12-22 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
* Jeff Richmond [2011-12-21 21:39]: > Yes, doing a lab eval on it and it has a nasty mibd leak bug. > Running a daily 11.2 build at the moment that fixes it (precursor to > R5 coming out in January). So, I would wait for R5 if you plan on > doing any SNMP work at all on the box. Same goes for VP

Re: [j-nsp] Junos 11.2R4.3 on MX

2011-12-21 Thread Jeff Richmond
Yes, doing a lab eval on it and it has a nasty mibd leak bug. Running a daily 11.2 build at the moment that fixes it (precursor to R5 coming out in January). So, I would wait for R5 if you plan on doing any SNMP work at all on the box. -Jeff On Dec 21, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Brendan Mannella wrote

[j-nsp] Junos 11.2R4.3 on MX

2011-12-21 Thread Brendan Mannella
Just wondering if anyone has been brave enough to run Junos 11.2R4.3 yet on a MX960? We are currently on the latest 10.4, but would really like to upgrade to get “trunk style” config on Trio line cards. I also noticed during a previous ISSU that the Trio based line cards aren’t compatible yet with