Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-13 Thread Nikolas Geyer
Data Center use cases, except some PTX1 products... albeit the ones that are dual personality with their QFX alter ego :-) Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 13, 2020, at 3:30 PM, Richard McGovern wrote: > > I am thinking (guessing) you will not see EVO on MX for some time. EVO is > mainly t

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-13 Thread Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp
--- Begin Message --- I am thinking (guessing) you will not see EVO on MX for some time. EVO is mainly targeted at Data Center use cases, for which MX is used for DC to DC connectivity, but not as a main stay within any DC. My 2 cents worth. Richard McGovern Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-13 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Alain Hebert said: >     I haven't unpackaged an Evolved distribution yet, but my > experience with WindRiver licensing back in early 2000, it would be > pricey. Heh, when you pay 6 figures for a router, two copies of Wind River Linux for the REs is probably barely a bump. Also

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-13 Thread Sonny T. Larsen
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:51:59PM -0400, Alain Hebert wrote: >     As for FreeBSD, they could have gone the way of upgrading the >kernel (I saw some evidences about 10.x but no confirmation yet) but >depending of their initial work done during the 4.x days, switching >might have been a better

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-13 Thread Alain Hebert
    I haven't unpackaged an Evolved distribution yet, but my experience with WindRiver licensing back in early 2000, it would be pricey.     As for FreeBSD, they could have gone the way of upgrading the kernel (I saw some evidences about 10.x but no confirmation yet) but depending of their ini

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-13 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Alain Hebert said: >     Since most of the reference implementation from their ASIC > provider with be Linux based ... the path of least resistance wins. This is on the RE, which is just standard Intel x86 stuff (or IIRC ARM for smaller stuff?). >     And, I think, the "prefere

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-13 Thread Alain Hebert
    Since most of the reference implementation from their ASIC provider with be Linux based ... the path of least resistance wins.     And, I think, the "preference" of the majority of their own devs/mgmt which never knew nothing but Linux =D. - Alain Hebert

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-11 Thread Gavin Henry
Whats its history? (will Google it too) I mean, from a software engineering point if view, it's a tough call to start again. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-11 Thread Saku Ytti
On Sun, 11 Oct 2020 at 00:24, Colton Conor wrote: > So is Junos OS Evolved available for the MX routers? How would you go from > regular Junos to Junos OS Evolved on a MX 240/480/960 for example? It is not, but expect to see it in future MX REs. -- ++ytti _

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-10 Thread Colton Conor
So is Junos OS Evolved available for the MX routers? How would you go from regular Junos to Junos OS Evolved on a MX 240/480/960 for example? On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:38 AM Saku Ytti wrote: > Hey Colton, > > > I was unaware of Junos OS Evolved until recently. At what version did > > regular Jun

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-09 Thread Alain Hebert
    Well this is coming from my experience with QFX5100, less of an issue with MX platforms but still for the price tag it was kinda hellish.     Been stable after we worked some of the pitfalls... still got some chipset related issue when someone makes an error and mix L2 VLANs with VLAN-CCC

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-09 Thread Jared Mauch
Like many things either it works or it doesn't. I'm not a fan of paying for software with bugs personally. We do have Evo in use. Sent from my iCar > On Oct 9, 2020, at 12:55 PM, Alain Hebert wrote: > > Nice another round of customers doing JNP QA :( > > - > Alain Hebert

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-09 Thread Alain Hebert
    Nice another round of customers doing JNP QA :( - Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443 On 2020-10-09 12:38, Saku Ytt

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-09 Thread Richard McGovern via juniper-nsp
--- Begin Message --- I think QFX5200-32C (and some PTX?) are only platforms that have support for both a Junos version and an EVO version. I think once [very hard if not impossible] to change. FYI only Richard McGovern Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks 978-618-3342 I’d rather be lucky than

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-09 Thread Saku Ytti
Hey Colton, > I was unaware of Junos OS Evolved until recently. At what version did > regular Junos evolve into Junos OS Evolved? Is there a certain version > where after that version, everything ongoing is Junos OS Evolved? I think EVO appeared in 19.1, but in most cases you don't have a choice,

[j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

2020-10-09 Thread Colton Conor
I was unaware of Junos OS Evolved until recently. At what version did regular Junos evolve into Junos OS Evolved? Is there a certain version where after that version, everything ongoing is Junos OS Evolved? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.ne