Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN advertises the directly connected subnet - why?

Hello, Thanks for your reaction. On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 08:47:44AM -0800, Andy Vance wrote: > Without config snapshots of the VRF, the import policy and the export policy, >it is difficult to say why you see this behavior, I have some ideas but I don't > want to guess. Can you provide config sn

Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN advertises the directly connected subnet - why?

Hi Luis, On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 05:41:45PM +0100, Luis Ximenez Gomez wrote: > > Well, if you use the command "vrf-target import target::yy" then > everything which is in your local VRF will be advertised via MBGP to other > peers with a matching RT. <--- your connected subnet will go > > I

Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN advertises the directly connected subnet - why?

..@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeroen Valcke Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 7:52 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] L3VPN advertises the directly connected subnet - why? Hi, I'm doing some testing with simple plain L3VPNs and ran into some weird behaviour. At least I think i

Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN advertises the directly connected subnet - why?

Have you got vrf-table-label configured ? On 1/26/10 4:51 PM, Jeroen Valcke wrote: Hi, I'm doing some testing with simple plain L3VPNs and ran into some weird behaviour. At least I think it's weird. Perhaps somebody can enlighten me. A CE router is exchanging routes with the PE through BGP.

Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN advertises the directly connected subnet - why?

juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of > Jeroen Valcke > Sent: martes, 26 de enero de 2010 16:52 > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] L3VPN advertises the directly connected subnet - why? > > Hi, > > I'm doing some testing with simple pla

Re: [j-nsp] L3VPN advertises the directly connected subnet - why?

niper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jeroen Valcke Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 7:52 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] L3VPN advertises the directly connected subnet - why? Hi, I'm doing some testing with simple plain

[j-nsp] L3VPN advertises the directly connected subnet - why?

Hi, I'm doing some testing with simple plain L3VPNs and ran into some weird behaviour. At least I think it's weird. Perhaps somebody can enlighten me. A CE router is exchanging routes with the PE through BGP. These routes are correctly advertised 'over' the L3VPN towards other CE routers. However