On Tuesday 20 May 2008, Mark Tinka wrote:
> Interesting that it even lets the 512MB operate as 256MB.
> M7i/M10i CFEB's officially support 256MB for CPU
> memory... go figure :-).
My mistake... just realized this is an M10 and not an
M10i :-).
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
On Tuesday 20 May 2008, Andrew Degtiariov wrote:
> Yes, I have changed 64Mb SO-DIMM on the FEB to 512Mb
> SO-DIMM taken from WS-SUP32 :-)
> E-FEB see one as 256Mb, old FEB - as 128Mb. It work
> without problems.
Interesting that it even lets the 512MB operate as 256MB.
M7i/M10i CFEB's officially
2008/5/19 Nugroho WH Adisubrata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Your log indicate new prefix could not be installed in the feb.
> In my experience, there is no other way than restarting feb.
> You need to restart them carefully.
> Be careful, sometimes the old box didn't work properly, so you
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Degtiariov
>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 6:02 AM
>> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [j-nsp] M10 FEB problems
>>
>> Hello.
>> I have expected p
ce394dc19b786a53
>
> because the peer sent a proxy ID that did not match the one in the SA
> config.2008-05-19 12:16:18infoIKE<85.72.37.175>
>
> Phase 2: No policy exists for the proxy ID received: local ID
> (<192.168.0.0>/<255.255.0.0>, <0>, <0>) remot
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Degtiariov
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 6:02 AM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] M10 FEB problems
>
> Hello.
> I have expected pro
Hello.
I have expected problems with Full view on M10 router.
Some of directly (L3 I mean) connected customers can't see anything
except his default gateway (there is IP on this M10)
In logs I see a log of similar entries:
...
May 19 12:54:16 hosto /kernel: RT_PFE: RT msg op 3 (PREFIX CHANGE)
fai
7 matches
Mail list logo
