Re: [j-nsp] M10 FEB problems (Eric Van Tol)

2008-05-20 Thread Mark Tinka
On Tuesday 20 May 2008, Mark Tinka wrote: > Interesting that it even lets the 512MB operate as 256MB. > M7i/M10i CFEB's officially support 256MB for CPU > memory... go figure :-). My mistake... just realized this is an M10 and not an M10i :-). Mark. signature.asc Description: This is a digita

Re: [j-nsp] M10 FEB problems (Eric Van Tol)

2008-05-20 Thread Mark Tinka
On Tuesday 20 May 2008, Andrew Degtiariov wrote: > Yes, I have changed 64Mb SO-DIMM on the FEB to 512Mb > SO-DIMM taken from WS-SUP32 :-) > E-FEB see one as 256Mb, old FEB - as 128Mb. It work > without problems. Interesting that it even lets the 512MB operate as 256MB. M7i/M10i CFEB's officially

Re: [j-nsp] M10 FEB problems (Eric Van Tol)

2008-05-19 Thread Andrew Degtiariov
2008/5/19 Nugroho WH Adisubrata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Andrew, > > Your log indicate new prefix could not be installed in the feb. > In my experience, there is no other way than restarting feb. > You need to restart them carefully. > Be careful, sometimes the old box didn't work properly, so you

Re: [j-nsp] M10 FEB problems (Eric Van Tol)

2008-05-19 Thread Nugroho WH Adisubrata
Hi Andrew, Your log indicate new prefix could not be installed in the feb. In my experience, there is no other way than restarting feb. You need to restart them carefully. Be careful, sometimes the old box didn't work properly, so you cannot remote it after restarting feb. Better if you replace w