Re: [j-nsp] MX and ipfix

2014-01-07 Thread Clinton Work
MX960 12.2R3 with BGP and IPV4/IPV6 is running ok so far. We hit PR876824 with ipfix sampling on one MPC type. The fix is included in 12.2R5. Clinton. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014, at 09:44 AM, OBrien, Will wrote: > It looks like I need ipfix to get full flows from MPCs on the MX. From > the Junip

Re: [j-nsp] MX and ipfix

2014-01-07 Thread joel jaeggli
On 1/7/14, 8:44 AM, OBrien, Will wrote: > It looks like I need ipfix to get full flows from MPCs on the MX. From the > Juniper site, it seems that I need 12.x code. Is anyone happily running it? > I've got 12 on some small SRX, but have been very conservative on MX code > loads. Been running 12

[j-nsp] MX and ipfix

2014-01-07 Thread OBrien, Will
It looks like I need ipfix to get full flows from MPCs on the MX. From the Juniper site, it seems that I need 12.x code. Is anyone happily running it? I've got 12 on some small SRX, but have been very conservative on MX code loads. I use bgp, ospf, vrrp, mc-lag, and some routing instances. Wi