On 1/16/2013 10:11 PM, Brandon Ross wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Keith wrote:
>
>> Peer #1 - all 4 networks are prepended with our AS 5 times:
>
> Okay so far...
>
>> This way I have two networks coming in on one gig link and the other two
>> networks are coming in over the other gig link.
>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Keith wrote:
Peer #1 - all 4 networks are prepended with our AS 5 times:
Okay so far...
This way I have two networks coming in on one gig link and the other two
networks are coming in over the other gig link.
No, you don't. You have all 4 networks coming in on all 4 l
>Is this why we have such a low number of active prefixes on peer 2 and 3?
Probably, yes. Do a show route extensive in few inactive prefix and it will
tell you the reason why it is in inactive state.
>What would be the effects of removing the local-preference 50 from peer 2
and 3 on our traffic?
Try to make this short. I don't have any gear that I can run in a lab setting to
really get to know how Juniper BGP stuff works so we get some help and
they give me access to an MX to play on once in a while.
Have 3 BGP peers. Have four networks we are announcing.
Peer #1 - all 4 networks are pr
4 matches
Mail list logo