Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread magno
ace (which unless it's changed are honor system based > > > still) as noted by "4x10G fixed ports and 1x front empty MIC slot > > > restricted" .. restricted = not usable without software upgrade. > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > &

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread Pavel Lunin
> That is not true. The ports are configurable and usable. But you need a > license to be allowed to use them. The license is just paperwork and you > dont need to activate it somewhere. However this policy will change in > the future, all MX5/10/40 bundles and line cards are EEPROM coded and a > l

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)
Hi Nico, which JunOS are you running? 10.4R7.5 here. Maybe they changed it on later MX5/10/40 bundles or its now beeing enforced on newer JunOS versions (just as i said)... Best regards, Jonas Am Samstag, den 19.11.2011, 18:46 +0100 schrieb Nicolaj Kamensek: > Am 19.11.2011 17:52, schrieb Jona

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)
-Original Message- > > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > > [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Wormington > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 3:22 PM > > To: sth...@nethelp.no > > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: Re

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread Saku Ytti
On 19 November 2011 10:21, magno wrote: > 2) the "T" versions (all the T versions, MX5, 10,40 and also MX80-T) > supports Sync-E according with G.8261 / G.8262 standards; All modular MX80 boxes should do SyncE. But IEEE 1588-2008 (PPT) needs better oscillator and -T denotes this. I think the non

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-19 Thread magno
empty MIC slot > restricted" .. restricted = not usable without software upgrade. > > Paul > > > -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Wormington > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-18 Thread Paul Stewart
n...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Wormington Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 3:22 PM To: sth...@nethelp.no Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B I agree the specs look to be the same, the only difference I can

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-18 Thread Kevin Wormington
I agree the specs look to be the same, the only difference I can see is the MX5 says it includes a MIC-3D-20GE-SFP and the MX80 a 20x1G MIC. Did they make a MIC that wasn't 3D? I'm pretty sure the MX5 is modular as well since it has the open MIC slot that you can get an upgrade license to be a

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-18 Thread sthaug
> The T version is copper only. The DC version is modular. Certain about this? In my price list (from August), these bundles are listed with exactly the same price. MX80-5G-DC-B: MX80 Promotional 5G Bundle, Includes MX80 Modular DC, spare DC Power supply, 20x1G MIC including L3-ADV license, Queu

Re: [j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-18 Thread Jerry Jones
The T version is copper only. The DC version is modular. On Nov 18, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Kevin Wormington wrote: I'm looking at the above two MX bundles and other than timing support on the MX5 they seem to have the same specs. Is there something that I'm missing? Does anyone on the list know

[j-nsp] MX5-T-DC vs MX80-5G-DC-B

2011-11-18 Thread Kevin Wormington
I'm looking at the above two MX bundles and other than timing support on the MX5 they seem to have the same specs. Is there something that I'm missing? Does anyone on the list know why one might want the MX80-5G-DC-B vs the MX5-T-DC? Thanks Kevin