On 19/Apr/16 04:01, Satish Patel wrote:
> Thanks mark,
>
> I asked my friend and he said its CPE router not good for aggregation.
Has your friend actually used the ASR920?
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.n
Thanks mark,
I asked my friend and he said its CPE router not good for aggregation.
As per spaces ASR 920 looks pretty solid.
--
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 10:00 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 18/Apr/16 15:39, Satish Patel wrote:
>>
>> Other cheap option I have Cisco AS
On 18/Apr/16 15:39, Satish Patel wrote:
> Other cheap option I have Cisco ASR 920 which has 2 10G fiber port.
There is a 4-port 10Gbps option as well.
>
> It hold 20k routes limit but any way we are planning to run default router
> over BGP
>
> Does this router has 20G traffic performance?
Other cheap option I have Cisco ASR 920 which has 2 10G fiber port.
It hold 20k routes limit but any way we are planning to run default router over
BGP
Does this router has 20G traffic performance?
--
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 3:33 AM, Edward Dore
> wrote:
>
>
>> On 18 Ap
> On 18 Apr 2016, at 00:34, Matthew Crocker wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 16, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>
>>
>> MX5 through MX80 are the same physical hardware, with all the same
>> physical ports built-in. The lower models have some ports disabled by
>> licenses; only buy what you need
> On Apr 16, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
>
> MX5 through MX80 are the same physical hardware, with all the same
> physical ports built-in. The lower models have some ports disabled by
> licenses; only buy what you need today, and you can "upgrade" with a
> license purchase later to
Same options are also available on MX104.
MIC slots and SFP+ ports are enabled by license.
Both platforms have same capabilities and are rated at 80G. The license does
NOT affect this as some think.
RE on MX104 is slightly better than MX80.
Also the MX104 has redundant replaceable RE and the MX
On 17 April 2016 at 02:46, Amarjeet Singh wrote:
> I would not recommend refurbished routers.
MX80 only makes sense gray/refurb. MX104 is cheaper than MX80 new.
--
++ytti
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.n
d not recommend refurbished routers.
>>
>> Br, Amarjeet
>>
>> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:30:14 -0400
>>> From: Satish Patel
>>> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>>> Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40?
>>> Message-ID:
>>> >> f7_
ed routers.
>
> Br, Amarjeet
>
> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:30:14 -0400
>> From: Satish Patel
>> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40?
>> Message-ID:
>>> f7_pxz6qoh0...@mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/p
Apr 2016 12:30:14 -0400
> From: Satish Patel
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] MX80 vs MX40?
> Message-ID:
> f7_pxz6qoh0...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> My requirement is 10G fiber link terminate on router but
Once upon a time, Satish Patel said:
> My requirement is 10G fiber link terminate on router but in future we
> can go with 20G link so should i consider MX80 or MX40 (cost wise
> also)
MX5 through MX80 are the same physical hardware, with all the same
physical ports built-in. The lower models ha
Are you going to receive full routing ?
Maybe mx104 could be better ... 4GB dram ( important ) with better RE 1.83GHz I
think ... ppc ( redundant RE optional)
Buy mx104 with 4 sfp+ onboad ports and buy mic modules
Same specs i think ... 80 gbps with 55 mpps
But you can populate with 4 x mics
My requirement is 10G fiber link terminate on router but in future we
can go with 20G link so should i consider MX80 or MX40 (cost wise
also)
If we buy MX80 so in base model it comes with 4x10G fiber ports right?
or do i need to buy them separately after buying MX80 chassis?
Additionally do i nee
14 matches
Mail list logo
