Hi,
JTAC point me to this PR :
https://prsearch.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=prcontent&id=PR1061067
This ressembles a lot to our environment (cluster + LSYS) but we are not
affected as we are running 12.3X48-D20.
HTH.
2016-02-29 23:35 GMT+01:00 Michael Gehrmann :
> Invalidated sessions
Invalidated sessions are norma but it's not normal to have an increasing
number of invalidated sessions which then prevent the box from passing
traffic. This is our experience which has happened twice in 3 months. We
saw a ramp up of invalidated sessions which peaked and then stopped all
traffic un
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 04:52:34PM +0100, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
> Here is JTAC feedback regarding this :
>
> "As I have understood it till now, the issue is with the invalidated
> sessions seen on the SRX.
>
> Seeing some number of invalidated sessions on the SRX is a normal behavior.
>
Here is JTAC feedback regarding this :
"As I have understood it till now, the issue is with the invalidated
sessions seen on the SRX.
Seeing some number of invalidated sessions on the SRX is a normal behavior.
Each valid session for which a FIN is received would be moved to the
invalidated sessio
No but I strongly suggest getting in touch with JTAC and running the debug
code. Only way forward at the moment.
Mike
> On 29 Feb 2016, at 21:32, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> Any other details you could share regarding affected platforms / junos
> versions ?
>
> BR
Hello Michael,
Any other details you could share regarding affected platforms / junos
versions ?
BR.
2016-02-29 7:21 GMT+01:00 Michael Gehrmann :
> Nothing public yet.
>
>
> On 29 Feb 2016, at 17:11, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So you Have a DEFECT or PR ID for this ?
>
> BR.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 11:35:33PM +0100, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you please both share model and running code versions ?
12.1X44-D35.5
SRX650
After rebooting the affected node the invalidated sessions went
and for 48h did not come back.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff
Nothing public yet.
> On 29 Feb 2016, at 17:11, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> So you Have a DEFECT or PR ID for this ?
>
> BR.
>
>
>
>> Le 28 févr. 2016 à 23:45, Michael Gehrmann a écrit
>> :
>>
>> SRX650 - 12.1X46-D36
>>
>> I'm told from JTAC the issue will be present in
Hi,
So you Have a DEFECT or PR ID for this ?
BR.
> Le 28 févr. 2016 à 23:45, Michael Gehrmann a écrit :
>
> SRX650 - 12.1X46-D36
>
> I'm told from JTAC the issue will be present in 12.3X48 as no fix has been
> identified yet.
>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
>> On 29 February 2016 at 09:35, Youssef B
SRX650 - 12.1X46-D36
I'm told from JTAC the issue will be present in 12.3X48 as no fix has been
identified yet.
Cheers
Mike
On 29 February 2016 at 09:35, Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you please both share model and running code versions ?
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
> > Le 28
Hello,
Could you please both share model and running code versions ?
Best regards.
> Le 28 févr. 2016 à 23:27, Michael Gehrmann a écrit :
>
> We have had the same issue on branch series. Juniper is asking us to run a
> debug version of code. I suggest you contact JTAC.
>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
We have had the same issue on branch series. Juniper is asking us to run a
debug version of code. I suggest you contact JTAC.
Cheers
Mike
On 28 February 2016 at 23:04, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We had an incident with one node of an SRX Cluster piling up
> invalidated sessions as seen f
Hi,
We had an incident with one node of an SRX Cluster piling up
invalidated sessions as seen from "show security session flow summary"
Now i was looking for the SNMP Mibs to monitor the number of
invalidated sessions per node but failed to find one.
JUNIPER-LSYSSP-FLOWSESS-MIB has max/current
13 matches
Mail list logo
