Re: [j-nsp] Multilink Frame Relay between Juniper M20 and Cisco 2621

2010-08-20 Thread Jim Lucas
Nilesh, Also, is this concerning? show interfaces ls-3/0/0:0 >>> Physical interface: ls-3/0/0:0, Enabled, Physical link is Down >>> Interface index: 349, SNMP ifIndex: 953 >>> Link-level type: Multilink-FR-UNI-NNI, MTU: 1508 >>> Device flags : Present Running >>> Interface flags: H

Re: [j-nsp] Multilink Frame Relay between Juniper M20 and Cisco 2621

2010-08-20 Thread Jim Lucas
> Hi Jim, > > In FRF.16, you bundle multiple DLCIs on a single bundle. The bundle is > mapped to multiple physical links. You Juniper configuration reflect the > correct the way of enabling FRF.16. However, I don't think your cisco side > is enabled correctly. On Cisco you have created 2 different

Re: [j-nsp] Multilink Frame Relay between Juniper M20 and Cisco 2621

2010-08-20 Thread Nilesh Khambal
Hi Jim, In FRF.16, you bundle multiple DLCIs on a single bundle. The bundle is mapped to multiple physical links. You Juniper configuration reflect the correct the way of enabling FRF.16. However, I don't think your cisco side is enabled correctly. On Cisco you have created 2 different bundles MFR

Re: [j-nsp] Multilink Frame Relay between Juniper M20 and Cisco 2621

2010-08-20 Thread Jim Lucas
My bad, missed this change. I added this to the ls-3/0/0:0 interface mlfr-uni-nni-bundle-options { lmi-type ansi; } Thanks again! > First off, sorry for such a long email. But I figured I would give as much > information as possible upfront to try and give a clear picture about what I > ha

[j-nsp] Multilink Frame Relay between Juniper M20 and Cisco 2621

2010-08-20 Thread Jim Lucas
First off, sorry for such a long email. But I figured I would give as much information as possible upfront to try and give a clear picture about what I have and what I am currently running. Central Office Equipment: Juniper M20 running v7.5R1.12 1x Link Services module (ls-3/0/0) Customer Eq