Thanks to everyone for the comments. In certain cases my comprehension was
just plain broken. This has helped clear that up.
> On Feb 27, 2019, at 6:51 AM, Weber, Markus wrote:
>
> Jason wrote:
>> I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around behaviour with route
>> policies that consist of
Jason wrote:
> I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around behaviour with route
> policies that consist of nested subroutines.
> policy-options {
> policy-statement P-TEST1 {
> term SUB1 {
> from policy SUB1;
> then reject;
> }
> }
> policy-sta
t; Subject: [j-nsp] Nested subroutine behaviour
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around behaviour with route
> policies that consist of nested subroutines.
>
> Consider the sample below:
>
> jlixfeld@mx# run show route receive-protocol bgp 4.4.4.4 table
Hi,
I’m having a hard time wrapping my head around behaviour with route policies
that consist of nested subroutines.
Consider the sample below:
jlixfeld@mx# run show route receive-protocol bgp 4.4.4.4 table internet.i.0
hidden extensive
i.inet.0: 32 destinations, 37 routes (28 active, 0 holdd
4 matches
Mail list logo
