Thanks for the responses thus far concerning BFD for BGP-signaled VPLS.
Some have asked about using RSVP: we originally set out to use RSVP, but
we ran into a number of bugs/issues in our environment. We aren't able to
take advantage of all of the "bells and whistles" with RSVP anyway, and
L
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011, Phil Bedard wrote:
If BGP stability is the main goal, do not use BFD with your BGP sessions.
Are you using site multi-homing with the connected CE devices or are they
all single-homed? I don't know your topology but there may be some
instances where you would want to run BF
On 18/01/2011 9:50 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
... In or after 9.4 a new daemon was created to allow
BFD to run in the forwarding plane and that became the default. I don't
have time now but I will post the link later.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list junipe
On Jan 17, 2011, at 11:50 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
> Of course I can't find the link now, but just last night I read that prior
> to JunOS 9.4 echo mode required a command to be entered in order to move BFD
> to the forwarding plane. In or after 9.4 a new daemon was created to allow
> BFD to run i
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:57 PM, wrote:
> > I agree except for using the IGP and RSVP for failure detection. RSVP
> and
> > OSPF/ISIS run in the control plane and BFD is designed to run in the
> > forwarding plane. Running BFD will diagnose issues where the control
> plane
> > is working but th
> I agree except for using the IGP and RSVP for failure detection. RSVP and
> OSPF/ISIS run in the control plane and BFD is designed to run in the
> forwarding plane. Running BFD will diagnose issues where the control plane
> is working but the forwarding plane is not.
The BFD Echo mode is desig
gan Holley
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:22:01 -0500
To: Thedin Guruge
Cc: Phil Bedard , , Clarke
Morledge
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Optimal BFD settings for BGP-signaled VPLS?
I agree except for using the IGP and RSVP for failure detection. RSVP and
OSPF/ISIS run in the control plane and BFD is desig
I agree except for using the IGP and RSVP for failure detection. RSVP and
OSPF/ISIS run in the control plane and BFD is designed to run in the
forwarding plane. Running BFD will diagnose issues where the control plane
is working but the forwarding plane is not.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:13 PM, T
Hi,
What i gather is that you have LDP implemented in MPLS level and edge
routers are dual homed with core routers, why not consider running LDP over
RSVP, RSVP LSPs will only be per link LSPs between P-PE links. RSVP will
provide sub second failure times and no need for a dirty full meshed RSVP
s
If BGP stability is the main goal, do not use BFD with your BGP sessions.
Are you using site multi-homing with the connected CE devices or are they
all single-homed? I don't know your topology but there may be some
instances where you would want to run BFD for BGP notification with
multi-homing.
I am trying to determine the optimal Bidirectional Forwarding Detection
(BFD) settings for BGP auto-discovery and layer-2 signaling in a VPLS
application.
To simplify things, assume I am running LDP for building dynamic-only
LSPs, as opposed to RSVP. Assume I am running IS-IS as the IGP with
11 matches
Mail list logo
