iginal Message -
From: "Nilesh Khambal"
To: "Philip Palanchi" , "juniper-nsp"
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:34:15 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] PIM SM RP issue
On M10is acting as RP, do you a route similar to this in the kernel and
cfeb?
R.R.R.R.S.S.S.S.103.a.b.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Smith W. Stacy"
> To: "Philip Palanchi"
> Cc: "juniper-nsp"
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:00:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] PIM SM RP issue
>
> Hi Phil,
>
> Could you share some additi
p"
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 2:00:52 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] PIM SM RP issue
Hi Phil,
Could you share some additional info? This certainly sounds like either a
misconfiguration or a bug, but without additional info, it's very hard to
diagnose.
Helpful info would include:
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Philip Palanchi
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 11:36 AM
> To: juniper-nsp
> Subject: [j-nsp] PIM SM RP issue
>
> We'
On M10is acting as RP, do you a route similar to this in the kernel and
cfeb?
R.R.R.R.S.S.S.S.103.a.b.c.d/104 ---> pd-x/y/z
To check this in the RE kernel you need to do "show route forwarding-table"
and in the cfeb "show route ip"
R.R.R.R is the address configured as RP and S.S.S.S is the addre
Hi Phil,
Could you share some additional info? This certainly sounds like either a
misconfiguration or a bug, but without additional info, it's very hard to
diagnose.
Helpful info would include:
JUNOS version
relevant config snippets from the Juniper RP and Cisco first-hop routers
'show pim
We're seeing what seems to be an interoperability problem when we configure PIM
Sparse-mode Rendezvous Point on either m10i or mx240 and the PIM source
registration messages are coming from cisco routers where the cfeb's, fpc's and
dpc's go to 100% cpu utilization all the time. The box stops res
7 matches
Mail list logo
