Anecdotally, we have an MX480 with RE-2000 in a very similar space as
you're describing: taking in 4x full v4 tables, 3x full v6 tables, and a
chunk of v4 and v6 peering routes at a couple of exchanges. No issues.
--
Hugo
h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber
PGP fingerprint (B178313E):
CF18 1
RE-2000 could support about 10M route in RIB.
RE-2000 is X86 based RE and MX80/MX104 is PPC based RE.
>From raw evaluation, in JUNOS PPC RE is about 1/3 performance vs. X86 RE
for same frequency,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Colton Conor
wrote:
> How many full routes can two RE-S-2000-4096
How many full routes can two RE-S-2000-4096 in a MX480 support? How limited
is this older card? How does it compare to the RE found in the MX104 or
built into the MX80?
On the MX480, when do most make the decision to upgrade from the RE-S-2000-4096
to a RE-S-1800X4-16G? What does the extra process
3 matches
Mail list logo
