Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection

2009-07-31 Thread Judah Scott
Thanks everyone for your help/examples. I tried this with an all-JUNOS topology and node-link-protection worked. One important thing to note is that a complete Route-Record on the primary lsp seems required for node-protection. Also, 'set protocols rsvp [interface] link-protection' is required o

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection

2009-07-31 Thread Harry Reynolds
Well, not enough time for me to wade through your ted. ;) I was able to do a quick sanity test and find both link and node bypass working. Watch for wrap in the below ascii topo. If you expand enough it should take the form of: r2-r3 | \ -\ | R0---r1-r4r5 Here, r1 is i

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection

2009-07-30 Thread Judah Scott
ether.net [mailto: > juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kari Asheim > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 3:10 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:15:04PM -0700, Harry Reynolds wrote: > >

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection

2009-07-30 Thread Harry Reynolds
30, 2009 3:10 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:15:04PM -0700, Harry Reynolds wrote: > I think that you only need to configure the rsvp interface > link-protection statement on the lsp's protection &g

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection

2009-07-30 Thread Kari Asheim
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 02:15:04PM -0700, Harry Reynolds wrote: > I think that you only need to configure the rsvp interface > link-protection statement on the lsp's protection > paths. That is to say, if the primary path exits a transit node on > fe-0/1/1, and you want that node to provide link

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection

2009-07-30 Thread Paolo Autore
ct: Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:10:11PM -0700, Judah Scott wrote: > Anyone have a config example of Fast Reroute Node Protection? The mpls > config guide is unclear which interface (the primary path interface or the > bypass path interface)

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection

2009-07-30 Thread Harry Reynolds
al Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Judah Scott Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 1:10 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection Anyone have a config example of Fast Reroute Node

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection

2009-07-30 Thread Kari Asheim
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:10:11PM -0700, Judah Scott wrote: > Anyone have a config example of Fast Reroute Node Protection? The mpls > config guide is unclear which interface (the primary path interface or the > bypass path interface) you must add "link-protection" and "bypass" blocks > to. My b

[j-nsp] RSVP Fast Reroute Node Protection

2009-07-30 Thread Judah Scott
Anyone have a config example of Fast Reroute Node Protection? The mpls config guide is unclear which interface (the primary path interface or the bypass path interface) you must add "link-protection" and "bypass" blocks to. My bypass is not being used. I've tried but can only get a dynamic link-