- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Lassoff"
To: "Cyn D."
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Route redistribution
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Cyn D. wrote:
Thanks for the input. Given our network topology, I am trying to avoid
running
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Cyn D. wrote:
> Thanks for the input. Given our network topology, I am trying to avoid
> running a full IBGP mesh.
If router C just needs internet transit, perhaps consider just
injecting a default route into your IGP?
It sounds like in this example, that most o
On Tue May 22 22:46:44 2012, Cyn D. wrote:
> Thanks for the input. Given our network topology, I am trying to avoid
> running a full IBGP mesh.
Anything stopping you from making B a BGP route reflector?
> Also forgot to mention, OSPF Area 5 is a NSSA so that I will have
> control over what is bei
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Route redistribution
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Cyn D. wrote:
Network connections:
We have router A(M120, 10.4), B(MX240, 11.4) and C(M7i, 10.4) connected as
a triangle. Router A and B are in OSPF area 0 and also run IBGP bet
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Cyn D. wrote:
> Network connections:
>
> We have router A(M120, 10.4), B(MX240, 11.4) and C(M7i, 10.4) connected as a
> triangle. Router A and B are in OSPF area 0 and also run IBGP between them.
> Router C is connected to A and B via OSPF area 5.
>
> Problem:
>
Network connections:
We have router A(M120, 10.4), B(MX240, 11.4) and C(M7i, 10.4) connected as a
triangle. Router A and B are in OSPF area 0 and also run IBGP between them.
Router C is connected to A and B via OSPF area 5.
Problem:
Router A has a lot of EBGP learned routes. These routes are
6 matches
Mail list logo
