+1 What Chris said.
Shouldn't be anything complex about these. Should be flat IX with a variety
of next-hops on the same subnet, not the route-server.
Cheers
Mike
On 11 April 2016 at 09:09, Chris Kawchuk wrote:
> 1. Do you have an import policy on the BGP session to the route server?
> (seeing
I am thankful for the fast and great responses.
Thanks everyone!
--
Jeffrey
-Original Message-
From: Chris Kawchuk [mailto:juniperd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 4:09 PM
To: Jeffrey Nikoletich
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Routeserver next hop issue
1. Do you have an import policy on the BGP session to the route server? (seeing
if maybe you're overwriting protocol-next-hop -- or you may have an inherited
policy at a higher level than the group/neighbour...dunno)
2. As you mentioned, What does 'show route receive-protocol bgp
' say in term
Hello Everyone,
First post here. We recently switched from Cisco to juniper and it has been
an adventure to say the least. We are running in to an issue with BGP
session with peering exchanges route servers. The session comes online and
doing a received-protocol it is showing the correct next hop
Hello Everyone,
First post here. We recently switched from Cisco to juniper and it has been
an adventure to say the least. We are running in to an issue with BGP
session with peering exchanges route servers. The session comes online and
doing a received-protocol it is showing the correct next ho
5 matches
Mail list logo
