I also experienced the same across both branch and high end SRXs. So I
prefer to work through CLI and only some stuff through GUI.
Hopefully Juniper will address these concerns and if any one come across
any workaround which can enhance GUI do share with all.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Ben Dal
Hi David,
> Just curious about your experiences with the SRX J-Web GUI.
Woeful, just like everyone else's. You've got to wonder whether the monumental
failure that the SRX GUI is, is one of the major reasons why the SSG Product
line is still available.
> We have been testing the SRX-210 for a
> I cant compare j-web performance between branch and DC series. Never used
> jweb on branch..
It's just as slow.
- CK.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
CLI was a nightmare on screenOS so at the time I used the web interface
which was ok in terms of reactivity.
Since we switched to Junos (first with Junos with Enhanced services) we
went to the CLI (like we do for all our routers) because :
- the GUI is very slow (on all systems I tested so far, J23
Hi David,
about your question on bigger ones: I recently used j-web on srx 3k and it
is slow...
I cant compare j-web performance between branch and DC series. Never used
jweb on branch..
On Mar 6, 2012 5:53 AM, "David Klein" wrote:
>
>
> Just curious about your experiences with the SRX J-Web GU
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:58 PM, David Klein wrote:
>
>
> Just curious about your experiences with the SRX J-Web GUI.
>
>
>
> We have been testing the SRX-210 for a couple of years and have noticed
> that
> the GUI is very slow to load and configure compared to an SSG5.
>
>
>
> We're running the S
Just curious about your experiences with the SRX J-Web GUI.
We have been testing the SRX-210 for a couple of years and have noticed that
the GUI is very slow to load and configure compared to an SSG5.
We're running the SRX at OS 11.4R1.6; the SSG5 at 6.2.0r5.
Is it just the GUI on th
7 matches
Mail list logo
