Re: [j-nsp] SRX240 - ready for prime time?

2012-03-09 Thread Mehmet Akcin
I am heavily using them, and they are reliable for me mehmet On Mar 5, 2012, at 3:28 PM, TCIS List Acct wrote: > Over the past few years the general feeling I've gotten reading j-nsp and > elsewhere was to stay away from the SRX line until the code matured. We've > got > an upcoming project

Re: [j-nsp] SRX240 - ready for prime time?

2012-03-06 Thread TCIS List Acct
Switching with a pair of 240s (and 650s) is supported in 11.1R3 and later, but it does not work with the smaller branch boxes. You need (at least) one extra cable between the boxes dedicated to switch traffic. Have not tried it myself, but it is in the release notes. Is this extra cable b/t the

Re: [j-nsp] SRX240 - ready for prime time?

2012-03-06 Thread Per Westerlund
6 mar 2012 kl. 02:20 skrev TCIS List Acct: > Thanks for all of the responses. > > A few more questions: > > - Can the L2 switch "feature" on the SRX240 be used when I have a pair of > appliances in HA mode? The docs seem to be conflicting on this -- it appears > that it may be supported in

Re: [j-nsp] SRX240 - ready for prime time?

2012-03-05 Thread TCIS List Acct
Thanks for all of the responses. A few more questions: - Can the L2 switch "feature" on the SRX240 be used when I have a pair of appliances in HA mode? The docs seem to be conflicting on this -- it appears that it may be supported in 11.x? - Can the SRX be used as a multi-tenant firewall t

Re: [j-nsp] SRX240 - ready for prime time?

2012-03-05 Thread Tim Eberhard
Having dealt with the SRX through some very trying times (from early alpha boxes running on SSG) to current 11.x code I have to say the SRX has come a long long way. The 9.x code train and even well into 10.x saw some pretty big bugs with HA, VPN and other critical features. I have you say 10.4 an

Re: [j-nsp] SRX240 - ready for prime time?

2012-03-05 Thread Brent Jones
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:28 PM, TCIS List Acct wrote: > Over the past few years the general feeling I've gotten reading j-nsp and > elsewhere was to stay away from the SRX line until the code matured. We've > got an upcoming project that I'm considering using a SRX 240 for. > > Has the code matur

Re: [j-nsp] SRX240 - ready for prime time?

2012-03-05 Thread OBrien, Will
Yes. I've got several deployed in those roles. Will O'Brien On Mar 5, 2012, at 5:28 PM, "TCIS List Acct" wrote: > Over the past few years the general feeling I've gotten reading j-nsp and > elsewhere was to stay away from the SRX line until the code matured. We've > got an upcoming project t

[j-nsp] SRX240 - ready for prime time?

2012-03-05 Thread TCIS List Acct
Over the past few years the general feeling I've gotten reading j-nsp and elsewhere was to stay away from the SRX line until the code matured. We've got an upcoming project that I'm considering using a SRX 240 for. Has the code matured to the point that it can be considered a stable platform