> From: obri...@missouri.edu<mailto:obri...@missouri.edu>
> > To: dim0...@hotmail.com<mailto:dim0...@hotmail.com>
> > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem
> > Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 1
Failover works fine on my 5800 cluster. I use direct connections for fabric and
control.
It sounds like you're losing traffic in Zmode. I'd start by taking a serious
look at your fabric links.
Do you have dual REs in each chassis for the double control links?
On Sep 3, 2013, at 7:34 AM, R S wro
@missouri.edu<mailto:obri...@missouri.edu>
> To: dim0...@hotmail.com<mailto:dim0...@hotmail.com>
> CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem
> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:19:35 +
>
> Failover works fine on my
ether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem
> Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:19:35 +
>
> Failover works fine on my 5800 cluster. I use direct connections for fabric
> and control.
> It sounds like you're losing traffic in Zmode. I'd start by taking a serious
> look at your
We are having a geographic SRX5800 chassis cluster with two redundancy-groups
(RG0 and RG1).
We are having many issues while performing the failover of the RG1, with and
without preemption. The issue is that when the RG1 becomes active on the node1,
real traffic is being lost. Also with preempt
5 matches
Mail list logo