Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem

2013-09-05 Thread Phil Fagan
> From: obri...@missouri.edu<mailto:obri...@missouri.edu> > > To: dim0...@hotmail.com<mailto:dim0...@hotmail.com> > > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem > > Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 1

Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem

2013-09-03 Thread OBrien, Will
Failover works fine on my 5800 cluster. I use direct connections for fabric and control. It sounds like you're losing traffic in Zmode. I'd start by taking a serious look at your fabric links. Do you have dual REs in each chassis for the double control links? On Sep 3, 2013, at 7:34 AM, R S wro

Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem

2013-09-03 Thread OBrien, Will
@missouri.edu<mailto:obri...@missouri.edu> > To: dim0...@hotmail.com<mailto:dim0...@hotmail.com> > CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem > Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:19:35 + > > Failover works fine on my

Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem

2013-09-03 Thread R S
ether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX5k problem > Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:19:35 + > > Failover works fine on my 5800 cluster. I use direct connections for fabric > and control. > It sounds like you're losing traffic in Zmode. I'd start by taking a serious > look at your

[j-nsp] SRX5k problem

2013-09-03 Thread R S
We are having a geographic SRX5800 chassis cluster with two redundancy-groups (RG0 and RG1). We are having many issues while performing the failover of the RG1, with and without preemption. The issue is that when the RG1 becomes active on the node1, real traffic is being lost. Also with preempt