Pavel Lunin
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:18 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering Issue
On 09.03.2011 21:47, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> What Ben is saying is that you it is simply not necessary to configure
> the AE interface when doing this on a Clu
OK, its clear and thanks for additional links.
BR,
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 9:48 PM
To: Walaa Abdel razzak; 'ben b'
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] SRX650 Cluste
On 09.03.2011 21:47, Stefan Fouant wrote:
What Ben is saying is that you it is simply not necessary to configure the
AE interface when doing this on a Clustered device. Basically, when you are
doing clustering, you simply add multiple ports from the same node to a RETH
interface and this bond
> -Original Message-
> From: Walaa Abdel razzak [mailto:wala...@bmc.com.sa]
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering Issue
>
> So, do you mean that load balancing happen by default on multiple
> Ethernet interfaces belonging to the same reth on the active unit? How
&
,
From: benbo...@gmail.com [mailto:benbo...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of ben b
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 8:12 PM
To: Walaa Abdel razzak
Cc: Stefan Fouant; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering Issue
Just add the additional interfaces to the reth interface. No need for
ae0 interface as mentioned
> above but it didn't work. Any other ideas are welcomed.
>
> BR,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 3:26 PM
> To: Walaa Abdel razzak
> Cc: Ben Dale
tioned
above but it didn't work. Any other ideas are welcomed.
BR,
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 3:26 PM
To: Walaa Abdel razzak
Cc: Ben Dale; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650
or not.
>
> BR,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Dale [mailto:bd...@comlinx.com.au]
> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2011 12:12 PM
> To: Walaa Abdel razzak
> Cc: Scott T. Cameron; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering Issue
>
> This is a
: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering Issue
This is a pretty common error when you are bringing pre-configured
devices together in a chassis cluster.
My advice would be to run the following from edit mode on each box:
delete interfaces
delete vlans
delete security
delete protocols
Then commit and cable
19:33:08 chas_do_registration: or_obj = 0xdfec00, or_rows = 23
> >
> > Mar 5 19:33:09 hup_init:Hupping init!
> >
> > Mar 5 19:33:09 JACT_INFO: Created re (h=9) Anti-Counterfeit FSM object
> >
> > Mar 5 19:33:09 ---cb_reset----re (h=9): reason=SUCCESS (0)
>
>
> This is a pretty common error when you are bringing pre-configured devices
> together in a chassis cluster.
>
+1
set interfaces fab0 fabric-options member-interfaces ge-0/0/2
> set interfaces fab1 fabric-options member-interfaces ge-5/0/2
>
>
In case of SRX650 this should be ge-0/0/2 and ge-9
pleted
>
> Mar 5 19:33:13 JACT_INFO: re (h=9): enter state: HOLD
>
> Mar 5 19:34:13 JACT_INFO: re: Read public key info...
>
> Mar 5 19:34:13 JACT_INFO: re: Prepare and send encrypted random
> messsage
>
> Mar 5 19:34:13 JACT_INFO: re (h=9): enter state: DOING
>
&g
Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Serrano Samaca,
Edinson (EXT-Other - MX/Mexico City)
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 11:02 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering Issue
Hello, can you give
Management is ge-0/0/0 and control is ge-0/0/1 and fabric is not
connected yet.
BR,
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hanks [mailto:dha...@juniper.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 10:50 PM
To: Stefan Fouant; Walaa Abdel razzak
Cc:
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering Issue
And I&#
niper-nsp/attachments/20110305/c010b4b8/attachment-0001.pgp>
--
Message: 5
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2011 15:06:46 +0300
From: "Walaa Abdel razzak"
To:
Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper SRX
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
: clear all chassis class alarms
>
> Mar 5 19:33:09 craftd connection completed
>
> Mar 5 19:33:13 JACT_INFO: re (h=9): enter state: HOLD
>
> Mar 5 19:34:13 JACT_INFO: re: Read public key info...
>
> Mar 5 19:34:13 JACT_INFO: re: Prepare and send encrypted random
> messsage
...@shortestpathfirst.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 6:00 PM
To: Walaa Abdel razzak
Cc: Scott T. Cameron;
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Clustering Issue
You need more than just the single command 'set chassis clustering' to
get a cluster running. Did you configure each nodes respective opti
; Mar 5 19:33:09 craftd connection completed
>
> Mar 5 19:33:13 JACT_INFO: re (h=9): enter state: HOLD
>
> Mar 5 19:34:13 JACT_INFO: re: Read public key info...
>
> Mar 5 19:34:13 JACT_INFO: re: Prepare and send encrypted random
> messsage
>
> Mar 5 19:3
on passed
Mar 5 19:37:18 JACT_INFO: re (h=9): enter state: PASSED
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Scott T.
Cameron
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 4:46 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:
I don't think this is enough information to really help you.
What does chassisd log say?
Can you provide a sanitized config?
Scott
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Walaa Abdel razzak wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
>
> We were connecting two SRX650 to work in Active/passive mode. Before
> they were having o
Hi All
We were connecting two SRX650 to work in Active/passive mode. Before
they were having old configuration and once we enabled clustering and
rebooted the boxes, they became in hold mode and we get a message of
shared violations even after reboot again and no user logged in, any
suggestions
21 matches
Mail list logo
