on Rough Scaling for T and M series MPLS PE
Terminations
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 01:38:01 pm Truman Boyes wrote:
> Depending upon your configurations, the actual scaling
> figures may vary. Here are some figures that should help
> in rudimentary sizing: you can setup 2000 VPLS inst
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 01:38:01 pm Truman Boyes wrote:
> Depending upon your configurations, the actual scaling
> figures may vary. Here are some figures that should help
> in rudimentary sizing: you can setup 2000 VPLS instances
> w/ 100k MAC addresses; you can setup 32k CCC
> connections, and
Hi There,
Depending upon your configurations, the actual scaling figures may
vary. Here are some figures that should help in rudimentary sizing:
you can setup 2000 VPLS instances w/ 100k MAC addresses; you can
setup 32k CCC connections, and somewhere between 2000 - 6000 routing
(VRF / v
All
Just wanted to get a feel for the "reasonable" scaling numbers when
using an enhanced M or T series Juniper as a PE router. In most cases
the PE router has T1 aggregation interfaces on the line side and POS
interfaces on the trunk side. Seeking numbers for both MPLS and VPLS
services.
4 matches
Mail list logo