Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-25 Thread Saku Ytti
> 4. Vendors don't often spin their own optics. Vendor C and J often > use optics from Agilent, Finisar, etc, which are just re-branded > (official label, different vendor ID programmed into the unit, > etc.). Agreed, I don't know any switch/router vendor who is also optic manufacturer. But I do

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-25 Thread Justin M. Streiner
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Saku Ytti wrote: Yet optic vendors even give you USB eeprommer boxes, where you can on-the-fly code your optics to fit another vendors router/switches, where they are seen as official optics. Possible reasons the market exists 1. Legally required by some customer contracts

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:06:03AM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote: > On (2012-02-23 16:53 -0500), Brandon Ross wrote: > > > I have no idea how they do it, but I can tell you for certain that > > I've been able to source DWDM optics for my clients within a week > > every single time. And yes, I'm referri

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2012-02-23 16:53 -0500), Brandon Ross wrote: > I have no idea how they do it, but I can tell you for certain that > I've been able to source DWDM optics for my clients within a week > every single time. And yes, I'm referring to specific colors. Sure you can source them, by querying multipl

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Brandon Ross
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Saku Ytti wrote: Both companies I work with can deliver optics very quickly, often next day and NEVER as long as 7-8 weeks and have VERY competitive prices (and I don't mean competitive with the router manufacturer's prices, I mean with other 3rd party optics). This is not

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2012-02-23 14:52 -0500), Brandon Ross wrote: > I strongly disagree with your characterization. I work with a > Both companies I work with can deliver optics very quickly, often > next day and NEVER as long as 7-8 weeks and have VERY competitive > prices (and I don't mean competitive with th

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Brandon Ross
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Saku Ytti wrote: Buying 3rd party can be done in many ways. One way is to use broken who uses many sources to find what you need. They can offer very good price and can rapidly deliver say any DWDM colour for any form-factor. But they have no idea what they are delivering, i

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2012-02-23 08:27 -0800), Bill Blackford wrote: > ok, I shouldn't post something I'm clearly not prepared to provide > empirical data for. This is what I've heard and I've certainly > experienced results that support this notion. I've heard the same, from my router/switch sales people. I'm sur

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)
The best thing nowadays is to get an eeprom programmer and do all this stuff yourself, this is what we do. This way you are flexible with 3rd party optics. You just buy a bunch of XFPs/SFP/SFP-P's with generic firmware and identifiers and programm the rest yourself for whatever device you are runn

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Bill Blackford
heh, ok, I shouldn't post something I'm clearly not prepared to provide empirical data for. This is what I've heard and I've certainly experienced results that support this notion. :) -b On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > On (2012-02-23 06:38 -0800), Bill Blackford wrote: > >

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Saku Ytti
On (2012-02-23 06:38 -0800), Bill Blackford wrote: > Several manufacturers, like Finisar, MRV, etc. send the units that > test well to Juniper, Cisco, etc. The ones that don't pass well, go to > third-parties. Alos, if they are surplus and used, they could be > dirty. {{Citation needed}} --

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Bill Blackford
When you evaluate third-party optics, do a complete test of them. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/specifications/transceiver-m-mx-t-series-1000base-optical-specifications.html http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/r

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Andreas Lund
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Robert Juric wrote: >> They may have changed their policy, but I believe Juniper only supports >> Juniper optics in their equipment. Others will work, but if you want full >> support from Juniper I suggest you talk to your account team. > > They also don't support cables, but

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Tim Jackson
Personally I've never had a single issue with Finisar, Fujitsu, or Opnext. SFP, SFP+, or XFP. On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Robert Juric wrote: > Thanks for the insights. Which 3rd party transceivers have you had the best > luck with then? > > Robert > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Danie

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Robert Juric
Thanks for the insights. Which 3rd party transceivers have you had the best luck with then? Robert On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:31 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:27:40PM -0600, Robert Juric wrote: > > Juniper also has only tested and verified their equipment with their > > o

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-23 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 02:27:40PM -0600, Robert Juric wrote: > Juniper also has only tested and verified their equipment with their > optics. If you want to know without doubt that it will work, go > straight to the source. "Without doubt" will give you surprises. See PR/486951 for extended fun w

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-22 Thread Robert Juric
There's not an expectation to support products they don't sell. Juniper sells optics, and if you want support for them you should get them from Juniper. Juniper also has only tested and verified their equipment with their optics. If you want to know without doubt that it will work, go straight to t

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-22 Thread Brandon Ross
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Robert Juric wrote: They may have changed their policy, but I believe Juniper only supports Juniper optics in their equipment. Others will work, but if you want full support from Juniper I suggest you talk to your account team. They also don't support cables, but no one ex

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-21 Thread Timh Bergström
Another good option for VC is the DAC/Twinax cables (0,5-5M) which you can get from juniper for the price of a decent dinner for two. //T On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Robert Juric wrote: > They may have changed their policy, but I believe Juniper only supports > Juniper optics in their equip

Re: [j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-21 Thread Robert Juric
They may have changed their policy, but I believe Juniper only supports Juniper optics in their equipment. Others will work, but if you want full support from Juniper I suggest you talk to your account team. Robert On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Mike Williams wrote: > Hey all, > > While I'm th

[j-nsp] Sources for SFP+ optics

2012-02-21 Thread Mike Williams
Hey all, While I'm thinking about 10Gb in EX3300s. Does anyone have a reliable source for 10Gb SFP+s suitable for VC use in EXs? US or Europe doesn't really matter, but US would be easier. We should be in the market for 20 or so shortly, to connect 4 bunches of 3300s into VCs. Only 4 would be dr