Hi,
On MX-Series you do not need any kind of tunnel services,
nor deactivating any port. The LSIs are created on the run,
and there is no limit - I have run a MX960 with 400 VPLS-Instances
(independent, not vlan in a virtual switch) without any matter. Performance
was almost linerate.
Tom
On 2
An Enhanced FPC is required, this is what was throwing me off. I guess I
don't know what is enhanced and what isn't, its not very clear.
I'm testing on m7i/m10i's using the non eCFEB, but I guess they are still
new enough as it seems to work without it.. As this seems to work is the
VPLS bandwidt
The short answer is:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos92/swconfig-vpns/configuring-vpls-without-a-tunnel-services-pic.html
This is meant to just need recent-ish pic's facing the MPLS cloud.
On 28/03/11 09:53, Chris Evans wrote:
> All the communication that we've received from J
Yes it does take some ports and resources to do this. $ for $ the 7K density
is still much cheaper than MX though.
Anyone know if VPLS will be built into EX8200 or Qfabric (doubtful) in the
future?
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Quinn Snyder wrote:
> otv requires a unique vdc (virtual context
f you enable
> tunnel
> services on a 10G interface then you lose an interface, but with
> no-tunnel-services I thought you didn't need to do that...
>
>
>
>
> From: Chris Evans
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Sent: Sun, Marc
otv requires a unique vdc (virtual context) to run, plus the desired
number of interfaces required to interconnect 'edge' with 'lan'
contexts, as there is no backplane interconnect between contexts. oh,
and vdc requires the advanced license (~$30k list). maximum number of
vdc per n7k is 4, as the
27;t need to do that...
From: Chris Evans
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Sun, March 27, 2011 5:53:14 PM
Subject: [j-nsp] VPLS scalability question.. OTV answer?
All the communication that we've received from Juniper is that they perceive
MPLS and VPLS to be th
All the communication that we've received from Juniper is that they perceive
MPLS and VPLS to be their answer to Cisco's OTV. I've been researching VPLS
on the Juniper platforms and I cannot find any definite information as to
how much it can scale performance/bandwidth wise. VPLS requires either a
8 matches
Mail list logo
