Hi Morgan -
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:23:57PM -0800, Morgan McLean wrote:
> Its an SRX3600 cluster, with no traffic traversing the fabric
> connection, so its all being contained on one chassis. These are just
> standard ICMP packets between two linux hosts on different subnets.
By ICMP packets
I feel compelled to share this link:
http://www.snookles.com/slf-blog/2012/01/05/tcp-incast-what-is-it/
Just in the event you haven't seen it or looked deeper.
Jared Mauch
On Jan 9, 2012, at 8:13 PM, Morgan McLean wrote:
> We're running over a terabyte in membase, but thats besides the point
We're running over a terabyte in membase, but thats besides the point.
Question still stands :)
Morgan
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 1/9/12 16:28 , Morgan McLean wrote:
> > Yes, we are using it for security purposes. Why would I spend so much
> money
> > on a box that
On 1/9/12 16:28 , Morgan McLean wrote:
> Yes, we are using it for security purposes. Why would I spend so much money
> on a box that is so limited in throughput due to its various fw inspection
> overhead?
>
> I am running two 3600's that connect via 10GE to a couple core 8208 EX
> switches, which
Yes, we are using it for security purposes. Why would I spend so much money
on a box that is so limited in throughput due to its various fw inspection
overhead?
I am running two 3600's that connect via 10GE to a couple core 8208 EX
switches, which then multihome down to top of rack switches. The 3
On 01/09/2012 11:23 PM, Morgan McLean wrote:
Its an SRX3600 cluster, with no traffic traversing the fabric connection,
so its all being contained on one chassis. These are just standard ICMP
packets between two linux hosts on different subnets.
I assume you are using these as a firewall, not ju
Its an SRX3600 cluster, with no traffic traversing the fabric connection,
so its all being contained on one chassis. These are just standard ICMP
packets between two linux hosts on different subnets.
Thanks,
Morgan
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> srx covers at least three
srx covers at least three different hardware architectures...
An srx 5800 in a publicly available testing can do sub 300usec
forwarding on small packet workloads.
what srx we're talking about would probably set the expectation a bit
better.
joel
On 1/9/12 14:40 , Morgan McLean wrote:
> In our
In our switch domain we have typically .1 ms of latency, however for
traffic being routed through a gateway on the SRX to another vlan, the
latency jumps up to about .5 or .6ms. Is this normal? Is this high? My boss
is putting pressure on me because he says this added latency is stressing
some cach
9 matches
Mail list logo