Re: [j-nsp] Why family Ethernet Switching under unit 0

2010-10-23 Thread Ramesh
I correct myself, there can be many units on a physical interface with inet defined. On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Ramesh wrote: > This is by design. Since having more than one unit's would not make sense > on family ethernet switching, one special unit had to be defined. So I guess > they we

Re: [j-nsp] Why family Ethernet Switching under unit 0

2010-10-19 Thread Ramesh
This is by design. Since having more than one unit's would not make sense on family ethernet switching, one special unit had to be defined. So I guess they went with 0. On family inet, there can be many more than one units. On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Muhammad Rehan wrote: > Hi Team, > > I h

[j-nsp] Why family Ethernet Switching under unit 0

2010-10-19 Thread Muhammad Rehan
Hi Team, I have a simple query,why family ethernet switching is always required to configure under " unit 0 " , why we are not able to use unit other than unit 0. Regards ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/m