Sorry for the confusion, yeah RSVP/CCC... no LDP on EX, at least not in the
version that we were running (9.x)
--- On Thu, 9/27/12, Chris Kawchuk wrote:
From: Chris Kawchuk
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Config help for basic MPLS setup
To: "Abdullah Baheer"
Cc: "Phil Mayers
Really? Wow. !
That must be new that the EX4200 supports LDP.
Which version of JunOS did they add LDP support into the 32/42 EX-series?
Just tried checking the JNPR website and the data sheets. All I can find
officially is RSVP/CCC support. Let me know where you spotted that. That opens
up an
Actually Chris, in my experience, i think you must have LDP to run LSP/CCC on
ex-4200, cough.. cough...
--- On Wed, 9/26/12, Chris Kawchuk wrote:
From: Chris Kawchuk
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Config help for basic MPLS setup
To: "Phil Mayers"
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date:
I've always had troubles using an EX4200 as a "P" router.
The only way Ive gotten it to "kinda" work is to build an LSP with the endpoint
having protocols { mpls { explicit-null; }}, so any EX4200 in the middle
doesn't try to 'pop' the outer label if it happens to be the penultimate…
although m
On 09/25/2012 03:16 AM, Tim Jackson wrote:
I'm pretty sure this is the case. EX4200 will not forward anything with > 1
label.
Just... wow. What is MPLS even *for* on those boxes?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.ne
> Multihop BGP between SRX & MX? The EXs don't need to learn the labels that
> are transiting?
P routers only need to learn the *outer* label (which tells you how
to get to the destination PE). They learn this from LDP or RSVP.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
Damn, so it looks like I'm stuck with ethernet-ccc on the SRX through the EX to
the MX. It'll work in my application but is not what I planned on doing.
-Matt
--
Matthew S. Crocker
President
Crocker Communications, Inc.
PO BOX 710
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
E: matt...@crocker.com
P: (413) 746
I'm pretty sure this is the case. EX4200 will not forward anything with > 1
label.
On Sep 24, 2012 8:40 PM, "Jeff Wheeler" wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Caillin Bathern
> wrote:
> > On point 2 there, the ex can only process one label at a time but there
> could be a larger label stac
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Caillin Bathern wrote:
> On point 2 there, the ex can only process one label at a time but there could
> be a larger label stack than that so it can be a P router.
I've been told the EX4200 will actually drop frames with more than one
MPLS label. If you are able
cker [mailto:matt...@corp.crocker.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 September 2012 9:16 AM
> To: Caillin Bathern
> Cc: sth...@nethelp.no; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Config help for basic MPLS setup
>
>
> The EX4200s will be P routes so I should be ok. I'll
: sth...@nethelp.no; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Config help for basic MPLS setup
The EX4200s will be P routes so I should be ok. I'll get BGP running on
the SRX & EXs tomorrow. The SRX & MX80 will be PE.
I'll update tomorrow if I can't get
On point 2 there, the ex can only process one label at a time but there could
be a larger label stack than that so it can be a P router.
-Original Message-
From: sth...@nethelp.no
Sent: 25/09/2012 8:25 AM
To: matt...@corp.crocker.com
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp
e a P router.
> From: sth...@nethelp.no
> Sent: 25/09/2012 8:25 AM
> To: matt...@corp.crocker.com
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Config help for basic MPLS setup
>
> > I have an MX80 and 3 EX4200s connected via 10GigE running MPLS, OSPF, etc
> I have an MX80 and 3 EX4200s connected via 10GigE running MPLS, OSPF, etc.
> I have some ethernet-ccc links working between the gear.
>
> I'm trying to setup my first MPLS based routing VRF (L3VPN ???) between a new
> SRX210 and the MX80 (going through the EX4200s).
>
> Eventually the confi
Hello,
I have an MX80 and 3 EX4200s connected via 10GigE running MPLS, OSPF, etc. I
have some ethernet-ccc links working between the gear.
I'm trying to setup my first MPLS based routing VRF (L3VPN ???) between a new
SRX210 and the MX80 (going through the EX4200s).
Eventually the configurat
irst.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2012 01:13
> To: Dale Shaw
> Cc: Josh Farrelly; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Config help with an SRX110 & ADSL
>
> Also, your DHCP propagate setting is referencing fe-0/0/0.0 whereas is should
> be referenci
From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 August 2012 01:13
To: Dale Shaw
Cc: Josh Farrelly; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Config help with an SRX110 & ADSL
Also, your DHCP propagate setting is referencing fe-0/0/0.0 whereas is should
be re
Oops, I meant to say that you should replace fe-0/0/0.0 with the at-1/0/0.0
interface under the propagate settings, since at-1/0/0.0 is the one receiving
the DHCP parameters from upstream.
Stefan Fouant
JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ENT, JNCI
Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks
Follow us on Twitte
Also, your DHCP propagate setting is referencing fe-0/0/0.0 whereas is should
be referencing vlan.0, vlan.1 and vlan.2. Per the docs, the propagate option
applies to the logical interface which will receive TCP/IP settings from the
external network for propagation to the DHCP pool running on the
[Apologies for top post]
There are a few problems with the config (once you get basic comms up
you'll need to look at your IPsec settings) but I suspect the main problem
is that interface at-1/0/0.0 isn't assigned to a security zone (untrust).
Cheers,
Dale
On Aug 28, 2012 8:10 PM, "Josh Farrelly
Hi guys
I'm having a few issues getting traffic to pass on an SRX110 I'm setting up for
a branch office. It may be something simple as this is one of the first times
setting up a Juniper device.
I have a default route, source NAT on the egress zone and policies configured
but I can't pass traf
Most customers are from layer 2 MSANs in several COs. A few are from legacy
ATM based DSLAM. We need to support both Internet and MPLS-VPN customers.
Ideally we can use E-series to build a full blown BRAS network. However
since all customers use static IP address only, we don't need the standard
BR
Haha looks like Robert already responded to you... At least it's nice to know
I'm not crazy and someone else would give you similar advice... :-b
Stefan Fouant
JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ER, JNCI
Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks
Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate
Sent from my iPad
On Oct
If you are using EX Series, take a look at PVLANs -
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/topics/concept/private-vlans-ex-series.html
This allows you to split broadcast domains into separate isolated broadcast
subdomains to constrain connectivity while at the same time keeping devices
You should take a look at Private VLANs. Here is a link for EX series but the
concept is the same.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/topics/concept/private-vlans-ex-series.html
Robert Juric
On Oct 10, 2011, at 3:59 AM, Richard Zheng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is our setup. Customer
Hi,
Here is our setup. Customer A comes in on vlan 2001, customer B on vlan 2002
and etc. We may uses separate subnets for each vlan. However it wastes lots
of IPs. Is there a way to use the same subnet, e.g. vlan 2001 uses IP
10.0.0.10, and vlan 2002 uses IP 10.0.0.11 and 10.0.0.12. How about use
26 matches
Mail list logo
