>> Yes we (large ISP) tried using dsc interfaces (MX series) to count RTBH
>> traffic and found, 1) they don't count, and 2) IPv6 is unsupported for dsc.
>> As with many Junos features, there is not parity between IPv4 and IPv6.
>> That alone bugged us, but especially as the counters did not work,
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 16:07, Niall Donaghy wrote:
> Yes we (large ISP) tried using dsc interfaces (MX series) to count RTBH
> traffic and found, 1) they don't count, and 2) IPv6 is unsupported for dsc.
> As with many Junos features, there is not parity between IPv4 and IPv6.
> That alone bugged
No problem!
@Niall : I can't remember if there was something under the hood that made
the discard *interface* more preferable than just a discard *route*. In our
implementation we have a qualified next-hop to send flagged traffic to a
local collector box first, and only discard if that's not reach
On Oct 12, 2018, at 9:07 AM, Niall Donaghy wrote:
>
> Yes we (large ISP) tried using dsc interfaces (MX series) to count RTBH
> traffic and found, 1) they don't count, and 2) IPv6 is unsupported for dsc.
That's what I needed to know! Back to standard discard routes it is...
Thanks to you and T
,
Niall
From: Tom Beecher [mailto:beec...@beecher.cc]
Sent: 12 October 2018 16:21
To: Niall Donaghy
Cc: Jason Healy ; juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] dsc interface on qfx5100
I’m pretty sure we drilled Juniper about the IPv6 discard interface thing a few
months ago and got a feature
nether.net] On Behalf
> Of
> Jason Healy
> Sent: 12 October 2018 02:37
> To: juniper-nsp
> Subject: [j-nsp] dsc interface on qfx5100
>
> I'm more of a layer-2 guy, but I'm trying to tighten up a few things on our
> qfx5100 that acts as our l3 core here at our campu
juniper-nsp
Subject: [j-nsp] dsc interface on qfx5100
I'm more of a layer-2 guy, but I'm trying to tighten up a few things on our
qfx5100 that acts as our l3 core here at our campus. We use RFC1918 space
internally, but I'd like to discard any traffic to these ranges if they
aren&
I'm more of a layer-2 guy, but I'm trying to tighten up a few things on our
qfx5100 that acts as our l3 core here at our campus. We use RFC1918 space
internally, but I'd like to discard any traffic to these ranges if they aren't
one of our known subnets. I have that working with standard "disc
8 matches
Mail list logo
