thx jeff. yeah, all these ports are actually already in ae bundles.
and i've disabled flow-control on all of 'em. seems like the best i
can do, i guess.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:01 PM, ryanL wrote:
>> good discussion. the tl;dr - nothing i ca
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:01 PM, ryanL wrote:
> good discussion. the tl;dr - nothing i can do about it. right?
You can add LACP/ECMP ports/paths to reduce the chance that packets
need to be buffered so long that the buffer becomes full.
To use a dirty word, flow-control might be an option as well
good discussion. the tl;dr - nothing i can do about it. right?
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Michael Loftis wrote:
> I was finally able to get this explained via a third party who designs
> these things ...
>
> Basically in S&F you have an input and output queue, per port. When
> port 1 sends
I was finally able to get this explained via a third party who designs
these things ...
Basically in S&F you have an input and output queue, per port. When
port 1 sends to port 2 frames are moved from 1's input queue to 2's
output queue. If 2's out queue fills, it blocks back into 1's input
queue
On 5/2/13 1:24 PM, Benny Amorsen wrote:
joel jaeggli writes:
There's literally no options in between. so a 1/10Gb/s TOR like the
force10 s60 might have 2GB of shared packet buffer, while an like an
arista 7050s-64 would have 9MB for all the ports, assuming you run it
as all 10Gb/s rather than
On Thursday, May 2, 2013, Benny Amorsen wrote:
> joel jaeggli > writes:
>
> > There's literally no options in between. so a 1/10Gb/s TOR like the
> > force10 s60 might have 2GB of shared packet buffer, while an like an
> > arista 7050s-64 would have 9MB for all the ports, assuming you run it
> > a
joel jaeggli writes:
> There's literally no options in between. so a 1/10Gb/s TOR like the
> force10 s60 might have 2GB of shared packet buffer, while an like an
> arista 7050s-64 would have 9MB for all the ports, assuming you run it
> as all 10Gb/s rather than 100/1000/1/4 mixes of ports
On 5/2/13 10:27 AM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, ryanL wrote:
i'm guessing this is a buffer thing, but i can't explain why it only
happens on my 1ge ports and not when i punt the traffic over an 10ge
Yes, it is a buffer thing. A 10GE interface is basically never going
t
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:27 PM, ryanL wrote:
> i'm guessing this is a buffer thing, but i can't explain why it only
> happens on my 1ge ports and not when i punt the traffic over an 10ge
Yes, it is a buffer thing. A 10GE interface is basically never going
to not have time to transmit frames unle
hi list.
i'm guessing this is a buffer thing, but i can't explain why it only
happens on my 1ge ports and not when i punt the traffic over an 10ge
port.
i have two 1ge in an ae bundle. both of them basically look like this:
Statistics last cleared: 2013-05-02 00:16:50 UTC (00:02:02 ago)
Traf
10 matches
Mail list logo
