Re: [j-nsp] firewall policer

On 7/3/09 4:30 PM, Bit Gossip wrote: Unfortunately I have tested it but the result is that the policer operates independently on the 2 interfaces with the result that the total out of the 2 GE is 2000k and not 1000k. Any idea way and how I can get it to work in aggregate fashion. don't

Re: [j-nsp] firewall policer

; -Original Message- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- > boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bit Gossip > Sent: 03.07.2009 5:30 PM > To: Sean Clarke > Cc: juniper-nsp > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] firewall policer > > Unfortunately I have tested i

Re: [j-nsp] firewall policer

Unfortunately I have tested it but the result is that the policer operates independently on the 2 interfaces with the result that the total out of the 2 GE is 2000k and not 1000k. Any idea way and how I can get it to work in aggregate fashion. Thanks, bit. On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 13:53 +0200,

Re: [j-nsp] firewall policer

Or use the "interface-specific" command in the firewall filter. In this case you can use the same filter in multiple interfaces without having shared bandwidth. /riku -- Riku Valpas r...@valpas.com +966 56 2526691 (KSA) +358 40 7296561 (FIN) > The way you have done it, the bandwidth will be

Re: [j-nsp] firewall policer

The way you have done it, the bandwidth will be shared Adding filter-specific knob to the policer will make them unique ... i.e. policer P { filter-specific;< if-exceeding { bandwidth-limit 1000k; burst-size-limit 15k; } then discard; } On 4/15/09 1:33 PM,

[j-nsp] firewall policer

platform MX480 junos 9.3 in the following config the same policer is appllied to 2 different interfaces via 2 different firewall filters. Will the policer police at 1 mbps the aggregate traffic of the 2 interfaces; or it will police independent at 1 mbps the 2 differrent interfaces? ge-5/2/1 {