outputs on each of the routers?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:
> juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Vlad Ion
> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 1:22 AM
> To: b...@paulen.net
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Su
rday, March 12, 2011 1:22 AM
To: b...@paulen.net
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] l3vpn help needed
> ping routing-instance vpn-a 10.10.2.254 source 10.10.1.253
PING 10.10.2.254 (10.10.2.254): 56 data bytes
^C
--- 10.10.2.254 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted,
Vlad Ion"
> Til: "Bjørn Tore"
> Kopi:
> Emne: [j-nsp] l3vpn help needed
> Dato: fre., mars 11, 2011 19:47
>
>
> hi Bjørn,
>
> If I ping 10.10.1.254 (local vrrp interface or 10.10.1.253 local physical
> interface)... I get 100% success rate.
>
> B
Den 11.03.2011 19:47, skrev Vlad Ion:
hi Bjørn,
If I ping 10.10.1.254 (local vrrp interface or 10.10.1.253 local
physical interface)... I get 100% success rate.
Br,
Vlad
I was thinking like
ping routing-instance vpn-a 10.10.2.254 source-address 10.10.1.253
if you have default-addr
g pinging the remote if with source address local if.
>
> /bt
>
> - Reply message -
> Fra: "Vlad Ion"
> Til: "Bjørn Tore"
> Kopi:
> Emne: [j-nsp] l3vpn help needed
> Dato: fre., mars 11, 2011 19:47
> hi Bjørn,
>
> If I pin
Hi,
I was thinking pinging the remote if with source address local if.
/bt
- Reply message -
Fra: "Vlad Ion"
Til: "Bjørn Tore"
Kopi:
Emne: [j-nsp] l3vpn help needed
Dato: fre., mars 11, 2011 19:47
hi Bjørn,
If I ping 10.10.1.254 (local vrrp interface or 10.10.
hi Bjørn,
If I ping 10.10.1.254 (local vrrp interface or 10.10.1.253 local physical
interface)... I get 100% success rate.
Br,
Vlad
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Bjørn Tore wrote:
> Den 11.03.2011 12:45, skrev Vlad Ion:
>
>> ping routing-instance vpn-a 10.10.2.254
>> PING 10.10.2.254 (10.10
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Phill Jolliffe <
ph...@saddlebacksolutions.com> wrote:
> Chances are his lsp to remote PE is up as he has the following route
> his is pinging active in his vrf.
>
I suppose but it looks like his configs work and MPLS/L3VPN pretty much does
the rest automatically
Den 11.03.2011 12:45, skrev Vlad Ion:
ping routing-instance vpn-a 10.10.2.254
PING 10.10.2.254 (10.10.2.254): 56 data bytes
^C
--- 10.10.2.254 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
___
juniper-nsp mailing list j
Chances are his lsp to remote PE is up as he has the following route
his is pinging active in his vrf.
10.10.2.0/24 *[BGP/170] 05:27:25, localpref 100, from 10.2.0.1
AS path: I
> to 172.16.150.1 via ge-0/0/1.0, Push 16, Push
299808(top)
If the recieve
Can you post the config or at least the routing table from the other side?
Are your LSP's up?
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Vlad Ion wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to simplify as much as possible the config I have for a L3 vpn
> over mpls between 2 sites but it seems that I now have some issue
Hi Diogo,
All 3 devices part of the mpls domain are J2320 routers that have only Gig
Eth interfaces.
BR,
Vlad
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Diogo Montagner
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> could you please share what is your hardware on the core facing interfaces
> ?
>
> There are some restrictions when usi
Hi,
could you please share what is your hardware on the core facing interfaces ?
There are some restrictions when using vrf-table-label.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.4/topics/usage-guidelines/vpns-filtering-packets-in-layer-3-vpns-based-on-ip-headers.html
Thanks
./diogo -monta
Hi,
I'm trying to simplify as much as possible the config I have for a L3 vpn
over mpls between 2 sites but it seems that I now have some issues: I can't
ping interfaces from the other site even though I see the routes so any
help would be greatly appretiated.
*Topology:* (ge0/0/3.110 vpn-a 1
14 matches
Mail list logo
