Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequalcostpath

2007-11-09 Thread Paul Goyette
> Agreed, however, with the load-balancing export mentioned > earlier, JunOS does per-flow balancing, hence, any particular > session (such as a VoIP call and a stream of UDP packets) > will always use the same path; thus they will still arrive in > the same order at the destination router. =)

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequalcostpath

2007-11-09 Thread Chris Kawchuk
hm. Good catch.! - Chris. -Original Message- From: Paul Goyette Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 11:29 AM To: Chris Kawchuk; 'Hamid Ahmed'; 'Andy Lamontagne' Cc: 'juniper-nsp' Subject: RE: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequalcostpath &g

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequalcostpath

2007-11-09 Thread Paul Goyette
> As both Chuck and Leigh have stated, you CAN use GRE tunnels > to do this, however, you will run into MTU size issues by > doing this. You will also need tunneling/Adaptive > Services/MultiServices PICs (or ASM cards if it's an M7i were > dealing with) to do gre tunneling. > > The far "clean