Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

hi Andy, Thanks for the detailed email. However i could get a better understanding if u can send me configuration snapshot. My intended traffic will use MPLS in the future but for time being i need to know if i can deploy GRE tunnels to compensate for OSPF unequal cost paths and then try load-ba

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

Also with GRE tunnels you may run into MTU problems. At last with MPLS you won't have that pro Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:39:23AM -0800, Hamid Ahmed wrote: > > >> 2) You are giving the explanation for equal cost paths. However in >> my case there are two unequal co

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:39:23AM -0800, Hamid Ahmed wrote: > 2) You are giving the explanation for equal cost paths. However in > my case there are two unequal cost paths. So my question still how > can u do that in using unequal cost paths ? > 3) Please explain when u say the followi

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

Hi Hamid, To control (or engineer) where you want traffic to go, you simply introduce MPLS LSPs. The beauty of MPLS is its *Traffic Engineering*characteristics. You can decide EXACTLY where you want your traffic to go. So, if you have 2 unequal paths, and you wish to load-balance between the 2,

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

Hi Andy, Thanks for your reply. 1) Can u send me a sample configuration of what u are saying with a brief explanation of your scenario? 2) You are giving the explanation for equal cost paths. However in my case there are two unequal cost paths. So my question still how can u do that in us

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

Hi Hamid, To expand on Chris's explanation, ECMP is Equal Cost Multi-Path, which allows for the use of 2 (or more) equal cost path at the same time; Load balancing the traffic between the different paths. As Chris also mentioned, this load balancing is done per flow and not per packet, so you don'

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

Hi, Its LAyer 3 load balancing. The traffic intended for load-balancing does is on pure IP with OSPF running and having unequal cost paths regards, Salman. GAY Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Which kind of load balancing do you want to do ? layer 3 ? layer 4 ? Are you on a MPLS

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path Hi Everyone, CAn anyone suggest me how to load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost paths. BR// HA __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail ha

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

Hi, Which kind of load balancing do you want to do ? layer 3 ? layer 4 ? Are you on a MPLS network ? Regards, Samuel Hamid Ahmed a écrit : > Hi Everyone, > > CAn anyone suggest me how to load balancing between juniper routers for > unequal cost paths. > > BR// > HA > > ___

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

toll-free: +1 (866) 470-8174 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hamid Ahmed Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 9:25 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path Hi Everyone,

[j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

Hi Everyone, CAn anyone suggest me how to load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost paths. BR// HA __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___