much
more..Unfortunately, life is not so easy :)
Regards,
Masood
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net on behalf of Derick Winkworth
Sent: Sun 8/9/2009 8:06 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] lsp required for vpls?
MPLS does not "
signaling protocols such as rsvp or ldp for the label
> swapping. bgp is still the protocol that utilize the lsp (in the table
> inet.3).
>
> vpls can be implemented via either ldp based (martini) or bgp driven
> (kompella).
>
>
>
> --- On Fri, 7/8/09, Simon Chen wrote
> According to this document, MPLS depends on RSVP...
>
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/nog/nog-mpls-model/html/mpls-model2.html#1035142
>
> I'm really confused and want to figure out exactly what the dependency is...
MPLS depends on label switched paths (LSPs). These LSPs can be impl
hat utilize the lsp (in the table
> inet.3).
>
> vpls can be implemented via either ldp based (martini) or bgp driven
> (kompella).
>
>
>
> --- On Fri, 7/8/09, Simon Chen wrote:
>
>> From: Simon Chen
>> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] lsp required for vpls?
>> To:
the table inet.3).
vpls can be implemented via either ldp based (martini) or bgp driven (kompella).
--- On Fri, 7/8/09, Simon Chen wrote:
> From: Simon Chen
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] lsp required for vpls?
> To: "Harry Reynolds"
> Cc: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net&quo
> Do I need to explicitly configure MPLS LSPs between the PEs (using
> protocols/mpls/label-swithing-path)? Or just configure RSVP or LDP on
> the PEs so that LSPs can be automatically established by VPLS?
If you use RSVP for your LSPs, they need to be explicitly created. If
you use LDP for your L
<mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Simon Chen
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 12:09 PM
To: Harry Reynolds
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] lsp required for vpls?
Thank you all for the reply.
Do I need to explicitly configure MPLS LSPs between the
--
> From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Simon Chen
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:35 AM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] lsp required for vpls?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I read in the VPN configuratio
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Simon Chen
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:35 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] lsp required for vpls?
Hi all,
I read in the VPN configuration guide that LSPs between PEs are required for
VPLS. However, I am able to establish
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:35:18PM -0400, Simon Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I read in the VPN configuration guide that LSPs between PEs are
> required for VPLS. However, I am able to establish a VPLS setup using
> LDP signalling, but without MPLS-LSP between PEs.
>
> Does anyone know why? My guess
Simon,
I am not a Junos expert, but in general since you enabled link ldp between
the PE routers and also a targteted ldp between PE's , you should be
okay. did on quiet get what you meant by "without MPLS-LSP" ??? because
you already have mpls lsp by enabling link ldp.
regards
dinesh
On Thu
Hi all,
I read in the VPN configuration guide that LSPs between PEs are
required for VPLS. However, I am able to establish a VPLS setup using
LDP signalling, but without MPLS-LSP between PEs.
Does anyone know why? My guess is that LSP is only required if you're
going for the BGP signalling, but n
12 matches
Mail list logo
