Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-26 Thread quinn snyder
just to be clear -- t1.606 is not supported. are you referring to t1.602 and t1.607 as being supported? q. -= sent via ipad. please excuse brevity, spelling, and grammar =- On Sep 26, 2013, at 13:18, Phil Fagan wrote: > Looks like only 102 and 107; not 106. > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-26 Thread quinn snyder
thanks, phil! q. -= sent via ipad. please excuse brevity, spelling, and grammar =- On Sep 26, 2013, at 15:59, Phil Fagan wrote: > I was actually refering to t1.102 and t1.107, however, t1.617 is the only > supported frame service I see on the SRX. > > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:05 PM, qui

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-26 Thread Phil Fagan
I was actually refering to t1.102 and t1.107, however, t1.617 is the only supported frame service I see on the SRX. On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:05 PM, quinn snyder wrote: > just to be clear -- t1.606 is not supported. are you referring to t1.602 > and t1.607 as being supported? > > q. > > -= sent

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-26 Thread Phil Fagan
Looks like only 102 and 107; not 106. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:50 PM, quinn snyder wrote: > all -- > > just a quick reachout. trying to dig through docs and either missing the > boat or it doesn't exist. either way… > > i need to know if the srx240 supports the frame-relay standard t1.606. >

[j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-25 Thread quinn snyder
all -- just a quick reachout. trying to dig through docs and either missing the boat or it doesn't exist. either way… i need to know if the srx240 supports the frame-relay standard t1.606. any pointers/links would be appreciated. thanks! q. -- quinn snyder snyd...@gmail.com