[j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

:carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry:: > > > > From: Misak Khachatryan [mailto:m.khachatr...@gnc.am] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 1:16 PM > To: adamv0...@netconsultings.com > Cc: Ivan Ivanov; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

[mailto:m.khachatr...@gnc.am] Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 1:16 PM To: adamv0...@netconsultings.com Cc: Ivan Ivanov; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable And we played a bit with colleagues and found third way, for me it seems the best - use no-install for

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

And we played a bit with colleagues and found third way, for me it seems the best - use no-install for protocol families, which effectively disables installing routes to forwarding table and somehow disables nexthop validation. My config is now like this: > show configuration protocols bgp mtu-

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>] On Behalf >>> Of Misak Khachatryan >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 1:02 PM >>> To: jason-j...@lixfeld.ca<mailto:jason-j...@lixfeld.ca> >>> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<ma

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

> From: Ivan Ivanov [mailto:ivanov.i...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2018 10:58 AM > > Hi, > > There are a few different ways to resolve the MP-BGP routes on out of band > Juniper RR. Depends on how flexible you want to be, one can use static route > in inet.3, change of the resolut

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>] On Behalf > > Of Misak Khachatryan > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 1:02 PM > > To: jason-j...@lixfeld.ca<mailto:jason-j...@lixfeld.ca> > > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mai

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

n-j...@lixfeld.ca<mailto:jason-j...@lixfeld.ca>> > Cc: > juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net><mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable > > Hi, > > I run two out of

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

..@puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net>] > On Behalf > Of Misak Khachatryan > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 1:02 PM > To: jason-j...@lixfeld.ca<mailto:jason-j...@lixfeld.ca> > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

e- > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf > Of Misak Khachatryan > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2018 1:02 PM > To: jason-j...@lixfeld.ca > Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable > > Hi, >

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

Hi, I run two out of band vRR with all vpn flavors and families, and don't need to have family mpls enabled on interfaces. It's version 17.4 but i don't think that matters. This should be enough: routing-options { rib inet.3 { static { route 0.0.0.0/0 dis

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

Hi Ivan, I did not, and that did indeed fix it. I don’t understand why it’s necessary so that’ll be my next read. Thanks! > On Sep 12, 2018, at 7:22 AM, Ivan Ivanov wrote: > > Hi Jason. > > Do you have 'family mpls' configured for the vRR interfaces? Although the RR > is out of band you ne

Re: [j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

Hi Jason. Do you have 'family mpls' configured for the vRR interfaces? Although the RR is out of band you need that family configured on the RR interface. Ivan, On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 12:10 PM Jason Lixfeld wrote: > Hi all, > > Trying to learn more about JunOS, I’m playing around with a vRR i

[j-nsp] vRR/L3VPN/Unusable

Hi all, Trying to learn more about JunOS, I’m playing around with a vRR instance (18.2R1-S1.5), and I haven’t been able to get something sorted. This vRR instance is running as an out-of-band RR for a few LDP enabled PEs. vRR is not running LDP so inet.3 is empty, but as far as I understand, a