This is fantastic! Thanks for the valuable input.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:38 PM, Julien Goodwin
wrote:
> On 10/03/11 18:42, Richard Zheng wrote:
> > SRX seems to be a really good candidate. It looks like all models have
> > almost identical features, the only difference is performance. I will
>
] virtual router, M or J?
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> On 10/03/11 16:50, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> > It sounds like what you really want is just an SRX (Probably 2x240, 650
> > or 1400).
>
> Scratch the 240's, from the data sheet:
>
> Maximum
Hi Richard,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Richard Zheng wrote:
>
> SRX seems to be a really good candidate. It looks like all models have
> almost identical features, the only difference is performance. I will buy a
> SRX100, maybe even 2 to test high availability.
I can only speak for J and
On 10/03/11 18:42, Richard Zheng wrote:
> SRX seems to be a really good candidate. It looks like all models have
> almost identical features, the only difference is performance. I will
> buy a SRX100, maybe even 2 to test high availability.
The SRX100 is a nice test platform, but it does have a bu
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> On 10/03/11 16:50, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> > It sounds like what you really want is just an SRX (Probably 2x240, 650
> > or 1400).
>
> Scratch the 240's, from the data sheet:
>
> Maximum security zones:
> - SRX240 - 32
> - SRX650 - 128
> - SR
On 10/03/11 16:50, Julien Goodwin wrote:
> It sounds like what you really want is just an SRX (Probably 2x240, 650
> or 1400).
Scratch the 240's, from the data sheet:
Maximum security zones:
- SRX240 - 32
- SRX650 - 128
- SRX3k - 256 (1k should be the same, but not listed on it's data sheet)
> A
router, M or J?
Hi,
I'd like to solicit some advice on router selection. The requirement is to
support many virtual routers, up to 50 to 100. It only needs a few GE
interfaces. Many customers are aggregated to it. A virtual router is created
for each customer to segregate among them. Built-in NA
It sounds like what you really want is just an SRX (Probably 2x240, 650
or 1400).
And unless you have overlapping address space there's no need for
virtual routers at all (and even then they'd only need to be routing
instances)
The J's at this point are essentially just (branch) SRX's with a
diff
Hi,
I'd like to solicit some advice on router selection. The requirement is to
support many virtual routers, up to 50 to 100. It only needs a few GE
interfaces. Many customers are aggregated to it. A virtual router is created
for each customer to segregate among them. Built-in NAT and firewall
ser
9 matches
Mail list logo
