On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 08:12:40 PM Tom Storey wrote:
> Assuming space were not an issue, is there a reason why
> you might avoid something like an M320, or maybe a T320,
> being the traditional "multi-protocol" boxes?
>
> Im just a curious bystander, trying to learn. :-)
Well, the MX can now
ilto:t...@snnap.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 9:13 PM
> To: Per Granath
> Cc: MKS; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] what would you put in this PoP
>
> Assuming space were not an issue, is there a reason why you might avoid
> something like an M320,
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 09:17:28 PM Keegan Holley wrote:
> I don't mean to offend, but I never understood these
> "design via commitee" threads. The OP never lists
> enough info to allow anyone to give a completely
> accurate answer. Then the answers and information
> provided are so varied t
.@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> >> boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of MKS
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 1:32 AM
> >> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> >> Subject: [j-nsp] what would you put in this PoP
> >>
> >> Hi
> >>
&g
2 AM
>> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [j-nsp] what would you put in this PoP
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Imagine a town of 15.000-20.000 people. What type of device/devices and
>> size would you put into this town, given the following requirements
&
puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] what would you put in this PoP
>
> Hi
>
> Imagine a town of 15.000-20.000 people. What type of device/devices and
> size would you put into this town, given the following requirements
>
> Residential triple play (HSI, VoD, Multicast)
>8
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 10:52:10 AM MKS wrote:
> Actually I was meaning ATM ports (155mbps = STM1 speed)
ATM doesn't necessarily mean 155Mbps. It's just that before
Gig-E, the common Layer 2 protocol that offered more than
100Mbps was ATM, on the back of DSL backhaul deployments.
If memory
> The fact the the OP is talking STM-1, means he's in SDH land
> :-).
>
> The appropriate MIC's for the MX would be SONET and SDH (the
> same MIC does both). Would certainly prefer that over ATM,
> for obvious reasons :-).
>
Actually I was meaning ATM ports (155mbps = STM1 speed)
What about redund
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:45:44 AM Julien Goodwin wrote:
> Except for this an MX80 should work, and now there's the
> ATM MIC you have that option, although it would limit
> you to 20 ge ports.
The fact the the OP is talking STM-1, means he's in SDH land
:-).
The appropriate MIC's for the M
On 23/05/12 08:32, MKS wrote:
> Hi
>
> Imagine a town of 15.000-20.000 people. What type of device/devices
> and size would you put into this town, given the following
> requirements
>
> Residential triple play (HSI, VoD, Multicast)
>8 IP dslams (GigE)
>Vod servers (4 GigE pors)
>
> Busi
Hi
Imagine a town of 15.000-20.000 people. What type of device/devices
and size would you put into this town, given the following
requirements
Residential triple play (HSI, VoD, Multicast)
8 IP dslams (GigE)
Vod servers (4 GigE pors)
Business connections (L3VPN)
10 Business connections
11 matches
Mail list logo