On 10/8/12 4:02 AM, Tima Maryin wrote:
> On 04.10.2012 14:30, Duane Grant wrote:
>
>
>> network-services all-ethernet;
>
>
> Btw, it's unsupported thing.
>
>
>> There are ways to do it per IFL, but I don't have an example handy.
>
>
>
> Last time i checked build-in ports of MX<=80 did not
On 04.10.2012 14:30, Duane Grant wrote:
network-services all-ethernet;
Btw, it's unsupported thing.
There are ways to do it per IFL, but I don't have an example handy.
Last time i checked build-in ports of MX<=80 did not support per unit
scheduling.
_
On (2012-10-03 23:54 -0300), GIULIANO (WZTECH) wrote:
> set class-of-service interfaces ge-0/0/1 unit 530 shaping-rate 20m
>
>
> The output traffic rates 19.2~ Mbps only (using MRTG and SNMP
> statistics and graphics).
What do you see on fully congested 100M ethernet, no policers/shapers on
MR
Hi,
MPC/MIC interfaces take all Layer 1 and Layer 2 overhead bytes into account
when shaping.
"egress-shaping-overhead" configuartion is an option - you can
add/subtract from [-63, +128] bytes.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.2/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-co
I personally use the following guide,
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos11.2/topics/reference/general/policer-guidelines-burst-size-calculating.html
except
with mutiples of 8ms (makes it easier on the maths).
For example, if you've got a 20mbit shaper applied to the interface than
the bur
The math for burst rate is a little odd. However it seems to average at around
10% of the desired rate. The burstiness (for lack of a better word) provides
for a better user experience rather than a hard policer.
Will O'Brien
On Oct 3, 2012, at 9:55 PM, "GIULIANO (WZTECH)" wrote:
> People,
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
