Re: [j-nsp] MX204 Tunnel Services

2019-01-02 Thread Timur Maryin via juniper-nsp
Perhaps encapsulation vlan instead may help. On 27-Dec-18 23:40, Fraser McGlinn wrote: Further to this, and to clarify I do already have tunnel-services enabled and after configuring I get output packets on each unit, but no input packets. It seems like the PFE is just eating the packets.

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 Tunnel Services

2018-12-27 Thread Aaron1
I see you using ... lt-0/0/0.100 lt-0/0/0.101 You might be hitting something I found a while back with lsys, same MAC address on both sides of tunnel link , issues with that If you are hitting up against that problem, Try either sitting MAC address on one side OR sitting a static arp entry on

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 Tunnel Services

2018-12-27 Thread Fraser McGlinn
Further to this, and to clarify I do already have tunnel-services enabled and after configuring I get output packets on each unit, but no input packets. It seems like the PFE is just eating the packets. fraser@> show configuration chassis | display set | match tunnel-services set chassis fpc

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 Tunnel Services

2018-12-27 Thread Tim Jackson
I've done LT interfaces on MX204 with multiple LSYS' to build some lab topologies without issue. This was back in beta and worked fine, haven't run it on newer code, but I do run GRE tunnels in 18.1R3 without issue. -- Tim On Wed, Dec 26, 2018, 5:43 PM Fraser McGlinn Hey Everyone, > > Yet anot